Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41220551›Full record

ArticleJMA journal2025

Residents' Learning Experiences about Patients' Social Difficulties in the Emergency Department: Qualitative Research.

Junki Mizumoto, Hirohisa Fujikawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMA journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Junki MizumotoCenter for General Medicine Education, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirohisa FujikawaCenter for General Medicine Education, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency departments (EDs) are increasingly tasked with addressing the complex needs of patients whose daily lives are threatened by non-biomedical factors. To optimize learning about social determinants of health in EDs, it is important to better understand residents' experiences and learning processes in this context. Methods: This qualitative study aimed to explore how residents with positive attitudes toward treating patients with social difficulties in the ED approach such cases and what they learn from these interactions. We selected a hospital where many ED patients present with complex social needs. The hospital is committed to non-discriminatory and equitable medical care and welfare, with educational policies that integrate patients' social backgrounds into daily care. Physicians in postgraduate years 1-7 were recruited purposively. In-depth online interviews were conducted, and data were analyzed using thematic analysis (a framework approach). Results: A total of 13 physicians participated, with three main themes emerging: (i) healing care in the ED, (ii) positive learning experiences, and (iii) conflict and resolution. Participants described providing healing care in the ED, noting the challenges they faced and the learning opportunities they gained. They emphasized the importance of understanding and responding to patients' needs while noting conflicts in the workplace. Conclusions: Novice physicians who have a positive attitude toward social problems in EDs approached patients with a non-judgmental attitude, provided healing-oriented care, and aimed to foster their professional development. They often experienced conflict that experts in health professions education need to address to better support residents.

Indexed as

complexityqualitative researchsocial determinants of healthsocial emergency medicine

Identifiers

PMID41220551
PMCPMC12598151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.