ArticleJMA journal2025
Awareness of Acquired Hemophilia A among Physicians in Japan: A Web-based Survey.
Article in JMA journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Role of cross-mixing tests in differentiating etiologies of prolonged aPTT: a single-center retrospective study.International journal of hematology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a rare, life-threatening bleeding disorder caused by the development of autoantibodies against coagulation factor VIII. AHA represents a diagnostic challenge, particularly for non-hematologist physicians who may initially encounter these patients. This study aimed to evaluate the level of AHA awareness among non-hematologist physicians across various medical departments in Japan. Methods: This was a prospective, cross-sectional, observational, web-based survey of non-hematologist physicians, conducted over a period of 2 weeks (April 1-12, 2024) in Japan. The primary endpoint was the participants' level of AHA awareness. Results: In total, 4,835 candidate physicians were screened, with 1,701 participants included in the analysis population. Of these, 84.2% had heard of AHA but only 29.7% could identify AHA symptoms and pathologies. More than 45% of participants in the emergency, general medicine, oncology, and rheumatology and collagen medicine departments were familiar with the disease name, symptoms, and pathologies, compared with less than 20% in the geriatrics, neurosurgery, obstetrics and gynecology, orthopedics, respiratory surgery, and urology departments. Although a high proportion (80.4%) of participants reported no experience of examining patients with AHA, many (79.4%) had examined patients exhibiting symptoms of AHA, indicating that they may have encountered patients for whom AHA should have been suspected. When presented with a fictitious AHA case, 44.3% of participants suspected and 34.7% strongly suspected acquired coagulopathy, with substantial variation observed between the different medical departments. Provision of additional laboratory results for the fictitious AHA case increased the proportion of participants who strongly suspected acquired coagulopathy to 38.0%. Conclusions: Awareness of AHA among non-hematologist physicians in Japan is limited and inconsistent across departments. Educational initiatives are needed to enhance awareness and disease-specific knowledge among physicians, particularly those who are most likely to encounter patients with AHA, which is essential for early diagnosis and treatment. UMIN clinical trials registry identification: UMIN000053895.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.