ArticleJMA journal2025
Changes in Anxiety and Depression in Patients with an Acute Myocardial Infarction that Received Treatment by Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and the ABCDEFGH Bundle Including Nurse-led Continuous Follow-up.
Article in JMA journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: It remains unclear which treatments are effective for addressing mental disorders in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Therefore, we evaluated the changes over time in anxiety and depression from intensive care units (ICUs) to outpatient departments (OPDs), as well as the post-discharge prevalence of anxiety and depression in AMI patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and received treatments based on the ABCDEFGH bundle, including nurse-led continuous follow-up. Methods: This retrospective cohort study involved 29 patients who were hospitalized in the ICU for treatment of AMI. All patients received PCI and treatment based on the ABCDEFGH bundle. Anxiety and depression were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at three phases: ICU, general ward (GW), and OPD. First, we compared changes in anxiety and depression scores over time using HADS across the three phases. Second, we assessed the prevalence rate of anxiety and depression after hospital discharge based on HADS scores. Results: Of the 29 patients, the mean age was 67 ± 14 years, and 66% were male. For the anxiety subscale (HADS-A), scores improved from ICUs to OPDs (6.4-3.9 points, p = 0.001). For the depression subscale (HADS-D), there were no significant changes between ICU and GW, or between ICU and OPD (5.4-6.7, 5.4-5.2 points, respectively; all not significant). At the OPD stage, 14% of patients were in an anxiety state, and 34% were in a depression state. Conclusions: In AMI patients who received PCI and treatments based on the ABCDEFGH bundle, the depression state remained unchanged from ICUs to OPDs, while the anxiety state improved after hospital discharge. The prevalence of anxiety was 14%, and the prevalence of depression was 34% after hospital discharge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.