ArticleJMA journal2025
A Qualitative Study of Japanese Medical Students' Perspectives on Clinical Practicum during Coronavirus Disease 2019.
Article in JMA journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Medical students are expected to contribute to society by applying their clinical knowledge and skills, particularly during times of crisis such as a pandemic. However, during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, Japanese medical students faced strict restrictions on clinical involvement, which limited both educational opportunities and their ability to contribute. This study aimed to explore Japanese medical students' experiences of clinical training under these conditions and to investigate their awareness of social contribution. Methods: This qualitative study involved semi-structured, peer-to-peer online interviews with 21 medical students from 19 universities across Japan. All participants had commenced hospital-based clinical training by September 1, 2022. Interviews were conducted between August and September 2022. Verbatim transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: Three main themes were developed: (1) Commitment to supporting patients and healthcare teams; (2) Decline in direct clinical learning opportunities; and (3) Online practicum: balancing benefits and drawbacks. While many students were eager to contribute, legal uncertainty, lack of practical training, and concerns about how patients perceived them acted as psychological and institutional barriers. At the same time, students emphasized the value of in-person clinical experience and demonstrated a growing awareness of professional identity. Conclusions: Despite limited clinical opportunities, Japanese medical students deepened their sense of professional responsibility and desire for social contribution during the pandemic. Medical education should provide clearer role definitions, institutional support, and hybrid models incorporating hands-on training to prepare students for future healthcare emergencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.