ArticleCureus2025
Immediate Articaine Allergy in Pediatric Dentistry: A Case Report of IgE-Mediated Hypersensitivity.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Local anesthetics (LAs) are widely used in dentistry and minor surgical procedures in children and are classified into two groups: esters and amides. Articaine, an amide derivative, is among the most effective and well-tolerated agents for dental procedures. Commercially available formulations are often combined with epinephrine. With the widespread use of these agents, reports of hypersensitivity reactions have emerged. We describe the case of an 11-year-old girl with asthma who developed immediate hypersensitivity to articaine during a dental procedure and was subsequently referred for allergological evaluation prior to additional dental care. Allergy to articaine, as with other LAs, is estimated to occur in approximately 1% of suspected cases. Most hypersensitivity reactions are attributed to vasovagal mechanisms related to anxiety, direct pharmacologic effects of epinephrine, or allergy to preservatives contained in anesthetic preparations. Allergological evaluation, guided by a thorough clinical history, involves performing skin prick tests, intradermal tests, and drug provocation tests based on the results of initial skin testing, in accordance with current guidelines. In our patient, the provocation test confirmed an IgE-mediated allergy to the LA, evidenced by cutaneous reactions and bronchospasm, along with elevated serum tryptase, highlighting the severity of the reaction. This case adds to the limited literature on LA allergy and underscores the importance for dental practitioners to recognize such reactions, acquire appropriate management skills, and ensure the availability of emergency treatments to address potential hypersensitivity events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.