Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41220463›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

The Impact of Telehealth Adoption on Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Arwa N Alakeel, Bashayer K Alskait, Ghala B Binshafi, Haifa A AlAmro, Shouq K Alkharji, Mohammad Elsherbini, Nujood A Aleid, Rahaf A Alfrayan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Arwa N AlakeelDepartment of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, AlMaarefa University, Riyadh, SAU.
Bashayer K AlskaitDepartment of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, AlMaarefa University, Riyadh, SAU.
Ghala B BinshafiDepartment of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, AlMaarefa University, Riyadh, SAU.
Haifa A AlAmroDepartment of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, SAU.
Shouq K AlkharjiDepartment of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, AlMaarefa University, Riyadh, SAU.
Mohammad ElsherbiniBasic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, AlMaarefa University, Riyadh, SAU.
Nujood A AleidDepartment of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, AlMaarefa University, Riyadh, SAU.
Rahaf A AlfrayanDepartment of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, AlMaarefa University, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telehealth adoption gained popularity during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and had substantial and various impacts on patient outcomes depending on the specific environment, healthcare system, and quality of telehealth services supplied. Hence, this systematic review explored those impacts and their sustainability post-pandemic. To conduct this systematic review, a thorough literature search was undertaken in electronic databases such as PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Google Scholar, databases, Embase, and PsycINFO using relevant keywords. We included articles written in English and published in the last 10 years that reported on the impact of telehealth adoption on various patient outcomes and the impact of sustainability post-pandemic. The findings of this systematic review highlight the remarkable impact of telehealth adoption on patient outcomes and the sustainability of these initiatives post-pandemic. Telehealth has proven to enhance various aspects of healthcare, spanning from prevention to follow-up. Another effect of telehealth adoption is the significant reduction in hospitalizations. Furthermore, telehealth profoundly impacts hospital stays, leading to a decrease in all-cause hospital days per patient by 1.07 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.76 to 0.39) days and a shorter mean hospital stay for condition-related hospitalizations by 89% (95% CI 1.42 to 0.36), providing evidence of efficient healthcare delivery. There was also a reduction in mortality rates for patients receiving telemedicine interventions. Telehealth is also cost-effective while remaining highly effective. Patient satisfaction is another key outcome of telehealth adoption observed. The convenience and reduced expenses of telehealth have garnered positive feedback from patients, reinforcing the desirability of telehealth as a viable alternative to in-person visits. Despite these numerous benefits, barriers and disparities in telehealth adoption and utilization persist, especially in rural hospitals that face challenges, including a lack of Health Information Exchange (HIE) capacity, limited patient engagement capabilities, and the absence of financial reimbursement. This systematic review underscores the remarkable impact of telehealth adoption on patient outcomes and its sustainability post-pandemic. However, barriers and disparities still exist, requiring attention to ensure equitable access to telehealth services. The evidence supports the continued development and implementation of telehealth initiatives to improve healthcare delivery and patient outcomes post-pandemic.

Indexed as

digital healthhealthcarepatient outcometelecareteleconsultationtelehealthtelehealth adoptiontelehealth impacttelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID41220463
PMCPMC12598373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.