Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41220429›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2025

Computational models for pan-cancer classification based on multi-omics data.

Jianlin Wang, Jiao Zhang, Xuebing Dai, Chaokun Yan, Caili Fang

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jianlin WangSchool of Computer and Information Engineering, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China.
Jiao ZhangSchool of Computer and Information Engineering, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China.
Xuebing DaiSchool of Computer and Information Engineering, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China.
Chaokun YanSchool of Computer and Information Engineering, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China.
Caili FangSchool of Computer and Information Engineering, Henan University, Kaifeng, Henan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor heterogeneity presents a significant challenge in cancer treatment, limiting the ability of clinicians to achieve accurate early-stage diagnoses and develop customized therapeutic strategies. Early diagnosis is crucial for effective intervention, yet current methods lack robust solutions to overcome this challenge. The Pan-Cancer Atlas has emerged as a pivotal framework to investigate cancer heterogeneity by integrating multi-omics data (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics) across tumor types. This initiative systematically maps inter- and intratumor variations, providing insight for clinical decision making. However, such frameworks often struggle to integrate dynamic temporal changes and spatial heterogeneity within tumors, limiting their real-time clinical applicability. In this review, we first summarize the available multi-omics data and public biomedical databases used in pan-cancer research. Then, we examine current pan-cancer classification approaches based on the computational models they employed, including machine learning and deep learning. We also provide a comparison of these classification methods to explore their advantages and limitations. Finally, we conclude by discussing the key challenges in pan-cancer research and suggesting potential directions for future studies.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networkdeep learning algorithmmulti-omics datapan-cancer classificationtumor heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID41220429
PMCPMC12599994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.