Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41220417›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2025

Ginger-Derived Exosome-Like Nanoparticles: The Effect of Extraction Methods on Metabolites and in vitro Anti-Lung Cancer Activity.

Tingwen Ming, Yang Yang, Jun Zhu, Juncheng Lin, Wang Yang, Guanbin Yu, Pengju Wang, Enxin Zhang, Qinhua Chen, Jingjian Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Natural Product-Derived Vesicles in Nanotherapeutics.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tingwen Ming *Sinopharm Dongfeng General Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, 442008, People's Republic of China.
Yang Yang *Shenzhen Bao'an Authentic TCM Therapy Hospital, Shenzhen, 518101, People's Republic of China.
Jun ZhuSinopharm Dongfeng General Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, 442008, People's Republic of China.
Juncheng LinSinopharm Dongfeng General Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, 442008, People's Republic of China.
Wang YangSinopharm Dongfeng General Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, 442008, People's Republic of China.
Guanbin YuSinopharm Dongfeng General Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, 442008, People's Republic of China.
Pengju WangSinopharm Dongfeng General Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, 442008, People's Republic of China.
Enxin ZhangShenzhen Bao'an Authentic TCM Therapy Hospital, Shenzhen, 518101, People's Republic of China.
Qinhua ChenShenzhen Bao'an Authentic TCM Therapy Hospital, Shenzhen, 518101, People's Republic of China.
Jingjian LiuSinopharm Dongfeng General Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, 442008, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In recent years, plant-derived exosome-like nanoparticles (PELNs) have attracted extensive attention. Among them, Ginger-derived exosome-like nanoparticles (GELNs) represent the most extensively studied category, demonstrating a wide spectrum of pharmacological activities. However, their specific efficacy against lung cancer remains largely unexplored and warrants further investigation. The appropriate isolation of GELNs is fundamental to all related research, yet a systematic comparison of different extraction methods is currently lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the differences among GELNs extracted by various methods and to investigate their anti-lung cancer pharmacological activities. Methods: The study employed four common isolation methods-ultracentrifugation (UC), sucrose gradient UC (sgUC), membrane filtration, and polyethylene glycol-based precipitation (PEG-based precipitation) - to isolate GELNs. The GELNs were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA), and zeta potential measurements. Stability was evaluated under various conditions, including saline, serum, and different storage temperatures. The compositional profiles of GELNs extracted by four methods were explored using non-targeted metabolomics. A549 cells and PC-9 cells were used to assess the cellular uptake and anti-lung cancer efficacy of the four GELNs types. Network pharmacology, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulations were integrated to elucidate the potential mechanisms underlying their anti-lung cancer effects. Results: The four methods successfully isolated GELNs with distinct profiles: UC achieved the highest protein yield (1.630 ± 0.022 g/kg), membrane filtration yielded the highest particle concentration (46.9 ± 6.71×10 Conclusion: This study demonstrates that although all four methods can isolate GELNs, UC is recommended for fundamental research due to its high protein yield, excellent stability, and potent in vitro anti-lung cancer activity. Furthermore, the anti-lung cancer activity of GELNs may be attributed to the regulation of GSK3B, PGR, and SRC by 10-Gingerol, Hexahydrocurcumin, and [6]-Dehydrogingerdione.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsExosomesLung NeoplasmsNanoparticlesZingiber officinaleA549 CellsCell Line, TumorHumansMolecular Docking SimulationAntineoplastic Agentsextraction methodginger-derived exosome-like nanoparticleslung cancermetabolomicsnetwork pharmacologystability

Identifiers

PMID41220417
PMCPMC12599200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.