Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41220352›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian journal of urology2025

Cryotherapy for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer-preliminary results in an animal model.

Azik Hoffman, Eyal Kochavi, Gilad E Amiel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Azik HoffmanDepartment of Urology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, 3109601, Israel.
Eyal KochaviVESSI Medical, Nesher, 368847, Israel.
Gilad E AmielDepartment of Urology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, 3109601, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesInitial treatment for Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) has remained mostly unchanged in recent decades. Cryotherapy with CO2 has been commonly used in medicine for many years. In this study, we present the results of a pre-clinical study aimed at developing a novel cryoablation device to treat superficial low-grade bladder lesions.

methodsFollowing initial technical and developmental studies, a rigid cryotherapy device was developed. A technical and efficacy assessment was conducted utilizing the porcine model. Overall, twenty-six ablation areas (up to four per animal) were evaluated. Following an initial routine cystoscopy, the bladder irrigation medium was replaced with CO2 insufflation, and each area was treated with 2 cycles (15 s each) of direct liquid CO2 spraying. After five days, the bladder epithelium was harvested for pathological evaluation.

resultsNo bladder perforation was noted on pathology. The initial efficacy and usability of the device were demonstrated. Pathological evaluation of treated tissue morphology revealed focal mucosal edema and necrosis with associated surrounding reactive fibrosis, with penetration depths ranging from 0.5 to 4 mm, without profound muscularis propria damage.

conclusionsInitial results suggest the safety and feasibility of cryotherapy utilizing CO2 spraying. Pathological analysis confirms its potential in treating non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Ongoing clinical studies aim to validate these results in human subjects, offering a potential paradigm shift in non-muscle invasive bladder treatment.

Indexed as

CryosurgeryUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalNeoplasm InvasivenessNon-Muscle Invasive Bladder NeoplasmsSwineanimal modelcryotherapyurinary bladder epithelium

Identifiers

PMID41220352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.