ArticleHealth policy and planning2026
Trends and patterns of inequality in modern contraceptive use in urban and rural India: are family planning programmes increasingly reaching the marginalized?
Article in Health policy and planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inequities in contraceptive use among adults in Lebanon: a national study.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Decomposing wealth-based inequality in modern reversible contraceptive utilisation in India: evidence from national family health survey, 2019-21.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Gender bias in fertility choices: how son preference increases the risk of short birth intervals in India.Tropical medicine and health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
India has made good progress in the use of modern contraceptives in recent decades, however identifying women who are left behind is important to policy makers for further improving availability, accessibility, and coverage of family planning services to the marginalized population and hence achieving the international and national development agenda. Using five rounds of the National Family Health Survey data conducted between 1992-93 to 2019-21, this study examined the trends and patterns in inequality-by household wealth quintile and women's education-in modern contraceptive prevalence rates (mCPR) and demand for family planning satisfied with modern methods in urban and rural areas. The findings showed a secular trend of increasing rates in the use of modern contraceptives across socioeconomic sub-groups within urban (mCPR among the poorest quintile increased from 32% to 49%, and among the richest quintile from 51% to 60% in 1992-93 to 2019-21, respectively) and rural (mCPR among the poorest quintile increased from 27% to 49%, and among the richest quintile from 49% to 59% in 1992-93 to 2019-21, respectively) areas. Similarly, the inequality over time-measured by the concentration index-in mCPR has declined from 0.311 to 0.158 in urban areas and from 0.247 to 0.143 in rural areas between 1992-93 to 2019-21. Despite the overall decline in inequality, the pro-rich situation persists in contraceptive use in the country, and the extent of the inequality was high for modern reversible methods, both in urban and rural areas. Our findings underscore the increasing availability and accessibility of modern reversible methods, particularly among marginalized populations, along with improved information provided on the range of choices. This will help in achieving the global commitment of universal access to reproductive health, including family planning, and balance the method-mix in a country that is currently dominated by female sterilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.