Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41220237›Full record

ReviewWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society

Safety of up to 140 Daily Applications of Recombinant Human Platelet-Derived Growth Factor (rhPDGF-BB) Onto Skin Wounds: Unboxing the Evidence.

Herbert B Slade, Samuel E Lynch, Jaime E Dickerson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Safety of up to 140 Daily Applications of Recombinant Human Platelet-Derived Growth Factor (rhPDGF-BB) Onto Skin Wounds: Unboxing the Evidence.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Herbert B SladeChisholm Clinical Research Services, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0550-8757
Samuel E LynchLynch Regenerative Medicine, Franklin, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9342-9414
Jaime E DickersonCoral Snake Consulting, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6748-9742

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor BB (rhPDGF-BB), is the only growth factor approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for tissue regeneration and rejuvenation indications. It has received four FDA approvals for both soft tissue (e.g., skin) and hard tissue regeneration/rejuvenation. Regranex gel, 0.01% rhPDGF-BB, is the only growth factor approved by the FDA for the promotion of skin wound healing. While the safety of one and two 15 g tubes of Regranex, generally sufficient for up to 60 daily applications onto open skin wounds, has never been questioned, a decade after its introduction in 1997, a boxed warning regarding rates of cancer mortality was placed on its label for daily use of three or more tubes. This was based on a mathematical calculation on incomplete data from an insurance claims database which was subsequently invalidated with the addition of three more years of data. Removal of this warning from the label required another decade and several very large propensity-matched database studies including over 13,000 patients. These studies provided incontrovertible proof that up to 140 daily applications (≥ 4 tubes) of rhPDGF-BB onto open skin wounds are safe, with no increased risk of either cancer development or cancer mortality. Removing a boxed warning is an arduous task that requires extensive and robust evidence; less than 4% of box warnings are removed once placed. Thus, the successful removal of the boxed warning from the Regranex label should reassure both prescribers and patients of the product's safety.

Indexed as

Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-sisSkinWound HealingWounds and InjuriesBecaplerminHumansRecombinant ProteinsBecaplerminProto-Oncogene Proteins c-sisRecombinant Proteinsbecaplerminboxed warningRegranexrhPDGF‐BBskinwound healing

Identifiers

PMID41220237
PMCPMC12605788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.