ArticleThe Veterinary record
Variation in perceptions of pain and attitudes towards non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use for different lameness scenarios in dairy cattle.
Article in The Veterinary record. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLameness diagnosis and treatment have important welfare and production consequences in dairy farming.
methodsA questionnaire examining factors affecting non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use and pain scores associated with 16 lameness scenarios was distributed among UK farmers, veterinarians, veterinary technicians and foot trimmers. Principal component analysis was used to allow investigation of patterns between different respondent demographics and lameness scenarios.
resultsAfter correcting for multiple testing, no significant associations were found between pain perception component variables and any of the variables examined. For attitudes towards NSAID use, there was a significant association with job role, with veterinarians more likely to provide analgesia across all conditions than farmers (p < 0.001). Both active digital dermatitis (DD) and trimming of a DD lesion were given high pain scores (median of 7 and 8 out of 10, respectively), but were less likely to be given NSAIDs than other conditions with lower pain scores. LIMITATIONS: This was a small, exploratory study, with potential for both confounding and limited power. Some of the variation seen between respondents may have been due to differential interpretation of the questions.
conclusionsWhile respondents broadly agreed on pain scores for each of the lameness scenarios, there was variability in NSAID use between job roles. Furthermore, NSAID use was less likely for some painful conditions, such as DD. This may lead to some cows being under-analgesed, with consequent welfare implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.