ArticleMedical care research and review : MCRR2026
The Dynamic and Multisource Nature of Support for Frontline-Led Innovation Teams.
Article in Medical care research and review : MCRR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This 24-month inductive study examined the practices provided by a variety of supporters to six frontline-led innovation teams. Analyzing 86 interviews with 35 team members and 17 supporters, we propose a comprehensive, idealized framework of dynamic and multisource support. These practices offered critical aid as teams dealt with limited innovation experience, limited relationships, and limited contextual awareness. We categorized the practices we identified into six sets-Ensure Foundational Support, Transmit Knowledge and Skills, Nurture Teams and Teamwork, Cultivate Relationships with Decision-Makers, Scaffold Project Work, and Foster a Holistic View of Innovation Work-and discussed their benefits and boundaries of effectiveness. Our framework challenges the notion of "one-size-fits-all" support, emphasizing the value of adaptive support instead. We also highlight the critical role of coaches and identify significant roles unexpectedly played by the funder, insurer, student fellows, and research-observers that provided instruction, resources, and encouragement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.