ArticleBrain and behavior2025
Validation of the Chinese Version of the HPV Stigma Scale: A Multidimensional Analysis in Women With HPV.
Article in Brain and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Validation of the Chinese Version of the HPV Stigma Scale: A Multidimensional Analysis in Women With HPV.Brain and behavior · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV) infection is a global public health issue, and HPV-related stigma can affect cervical cancer prevention. But no validated tools exist to assess HPV stigma in Chinese adult women infected with HPV. This study aimed to adapt and validate the HPVsStigma scale (HPV-SS) in the Chinese context.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted from December 2024 to February 2025 among 501 HPV-infected women in Shenzhen, China. The HPV-SS was adapted from a 12-item HIV stigma scale. Demographic characteristics, HPV-related variables, and data on mental health were collected. Factor analyses (FA) were used to assess the scale's factorial structure, reliability, and validity. The bi-factor model was used to determine the score-reporting method of the scale. Item response theory (IRT) was employed to assess the relationship between participants' stigma levels and scale scores. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was conducted to classify the participants with different HPV stigma characteristics and determine the optimal cut-off value for HPV-SS.
resultsFA showed that the 3-factor model (personalized stigma, public-disclosure concerns, and negative self-image) had the best fit among the nested models, with good reliability and validity. The bi-factor model analysis indicated that the total scale score was more meaningful than dimension scores. IRT analysis confirmed that higher HPV-SS scores represented higher stigma levels. LPA identified a 2-class model as optimal, and the optimal cut-off value of the scale for high HPV stigma was 35.
conclusionThis study validated the 12-item HPV-SS for Chinese women infected with HPV, with good reliability and validity. The scale can be used to evaluate HPV stigma levels, facilitating targeted interventions to improve cervical cancer prevention and the psychological well-being of affected women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.