Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41220002›Full record

ArticleBiology of sex differences2025

Sex-specific machine learning classification models improve outcome prediction for abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Katherine E Kerr, Indrani Sen, Pete H Gueldner, Tiziano Tallarita, Joseph C Wildenberg, Nathan L Liang, David A Vorp, Timothy K Chung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of sex differences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katherine E KerrDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Indrani SenDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic Health Systems, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, USA.
Pete H GueldnerDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Tiziano TallaritaDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic Health Systems, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, USA.
Joseph C WildenbergDivision of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Health Systems, Eau Claire, Wisconsin, USA.
Nathan L LiangDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
David A Vorp *Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Timothy K Chung *Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. timothy.chung@utsa.edu.

Funding

Biomechanics in Regenerative Medicine (BiRM) Training ProgramT32EB034216 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI David Alan Vorp · 2023 to 2026
$855k
A Machine Learning-Based Clinical Decision Support Tool to Predict Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Prognosis Using Existing Longitudinal DataR21HL156246 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI VORP, DAVID ALAN · 2021 to 2022
$236k
American Heart Association 24PRE1195123National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program 1747452National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program 2139321NHLBI NIH HHS HL156246NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL156246NIBIB NIH HHS EB034216NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB034216
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is an abnormal dilation of the abdominal aorta that carries up to a 90% mortality rate when ruptured. Although male patients experience AAA at a higher rate than females, female patients experience AAA rupture at a rate three- to four-fold higher that of their male counterparts. The current standard clinicians use for determining when to surgically intervene is maximum transverse diameter of the AAA perpendicular to the axis of flow. However, some aneurysms below these diameter thresholds rupture. Machine learning (ML) classification models have been previously shown to predict patient outcomes with more discriminability than the diameter criterion. However, these models do not consider sex-based differences. In this proof-of-concept study, we investigate how creating sex-specific ML models impacts patient outcome prediction as compared to a general model encompassing all patients (sex agnostic).

methodsComputed tomography image sets were acquired from 537 patients (n = 159 female, n = 378 male) at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) and Mayo Clinic Health Systems. Features used as input to the ML models were categorized as clinical, biomechanical, and morphological data. Prior to ML model training, patient data were randomly split for 20% holdout testing. ML models encompassing all patients (general model), only male patients (male-specific model), and only female patients (female-specific model) were trained and tested.

resultsA female-specific model and male-specific model both had a higher maximum area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve values than a general model for female patients and male patients, respectively. Equalizing the sample sizes of female and male patients in the model led to improved outcomes for female patients without decreasing performance for male patients.

conclusionML classification models show promise in improving predictions of patient outcomes for AAA. The higher AAA prevalence rate for males leads to female patients being underrepresented in AAA datasets. In this proof-of-concept study, we demonstrated that sex-specific models outperformed a general model in predicting patient outcomes. Additionally, equalizing sample sizes within the dataset improved predictions for female patients without compromising overall performance of the model. As ML applications in medicine continue to grow, it is important to consider population representation within datasets to reduce model bias.

Indexed as

Aortic Aneurysm, AbdominalMachine LearningSex CharacteristicsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTomography, X-Ray ComputedAbdominal aortic aneurysmAI explainabilityBiomechanicsMachine learningMorphologyOutcome predictionSex-based differencesShape analysisStress analysisVascular surgery

Identifiers

PMID41220002
PMCPMC12607067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.