Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41219967›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

Explainable machine learning for differential diagnosis of diabetic foot infection and osteomyelitis: a two-center study and clinically applicable web calculator using routine blood biomarkers.

Parhat Yasin, Shiming Dong, Zubaidanmu Aizezi, Yasen Yimit, Alimujiang Yusufu, Maihemuti Yakufu, Xinghua Song

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Parhat Yasin *Department of Spine Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830000, People's Republic of China.
Shiming Dong *The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830000, People's Republic of China.
Zubaidanmu AizeziDepartment of Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830000, People's Republic of China.
Yasen YimitXinjiang Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence Assisted Imaging Diagnosis, Department of Radiology, The First People's Hospital of Kashi Prefecture, Kashi, Xinjiang, 844000, People's Republic of China.
Alimujiang YusufuDepartment of Spine Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830000, People's Republic of China.
Maihemuti YakufuDepartment of Spine Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830000, People's Republic of China. mhmtykf@xjmu.edu.cn.
Xinghua SongDepartment of Spine Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, Xinjiang, 830000, People's Republic of China. songxinghua19@163.com.

Funding

the Health Care and Medical Research Special Project of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region BL202460
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetic foot complications, including infections and osteomyelitis, pose significant health risks, with high prevalence and amputation rates. Differentiating diabetic foot infection (DFI) from osteomyelitis (OM) is challenging due to overlapping symptoms and limitations of current diagnostic methods. This study aimed to develop and validate an explainable machine learning (ML) model using routine blood biomarkers to improve differential diagnosis and provide a clinically accessible tool.

methodsThis retrospective, two-center study included 3,612 patients diagnosed with either DFI (n = 1,699) or OM (n = 1,913). Data from Center 1 (n = 3271) were used for model development (75% training, 25% internal validation), and data from Center 2 (n = 341) served as an independent external validation cohort. A robust feature selection pipeline identified the most predictive routine biomarkers. Multiple machine learning classifiers were trained and evaluated, with the top-performing model selected based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Brier score, and other key metrics. Explainable AI (XAI) techniques (SHAP, LIME) were used to ensure model transparency. A web-based calculator was developed for clinical translation.

resultsA LightGBM model using only six biomarkers—Age, HbA1c, Creatinine, Albumin, ESR, and Sodium—was selected as the final model. It achieved an AUC of 0.879 (95% CI 0.854–0.902) in internal validation and demonstrated excellent, generalizable performance in the external cohort with an AUC of 0.942 (95% CI 0.936–0.950). The model was well-calibrated and showed significant clinical utility in decision curve analysis. SHAP analysis quantified the specific contribution of each biomarker to individual predictions, enhancing interpretability. The final model was deployed as a user-friendly, publicly accessible web calculator.

conclusionsAn externally validated machine learning model based on six routine blood biomarkers can accurately and reliably differentiate DFI from OM. The model demonstrated high discriminative performance and clinical utility. Deployed as a transparent web calculator with integrated explainable AI, this low-cost tool has the potential to aid clinicians in diagnostic decision-making, particularly in resource-limited settings. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDiabetic FootMachine LearningOsteomyelitisAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsRetrospective StudiesBiomarkersBlood biomarkersDiabetic foot infectionExplainable artificial intelligence (XAI)Machine learningOsteomyelitis

Identifiers

PMID41219967
PMCPMC12606877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.