ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025
Characterization of motor unit activities during isometric elbow flexion with different speeds.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hydrogels for Skeletal Muscle Regeneration: Design, Fabrication, and Future Applications.ACS polymers Au · 2026Review
- Reliability of Between-Session Motor Units Behavior: A Comparison of Analytical Approaches for Intervention Studies.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe neural mechanisms regulating muscle activity exhibit variations under different contraction levels and speeds. This study aims to systematically characterize motor unit (MU) behavior during isometric elbow flexion tasks performed at different force levels and contraction speeds, using high-density surface electromyography (HDsEMG) decomposition.
methodsHDsEMG signals were recorded from the biceps and triceps brachii muscles of 61 participants during force-tracking tasks at four force levels (10%, 30%, 50%, and 70% of maximum voluntary contraction, MVC) and three contraction speeds (5%, 10%, and 20%MVC/s). A convolution kernel compensation algorithm was used to decompose the sEMG signals into MU spike trains. Motor unit features were extracted and analyzed, including recruitment thresholds, discharge rates, action potential amplitude, common drive measures, and force-tracking performance. MAIN
resultsAcross varying contraction levels and speeds, the number of identified MUs from each condition ranged from 9 to 15 for the biceps brachii and 3 to 9 MUs for triceps brachii. Motor unit recruitment and action potential amplitudes increased with force, consistent with the size principle. Faster contractions led to higher discharge rates at recruitment and derecruitment, greater common drive (as indicated by principal component analysis), and higher force-tracking error. These adaptations are more pronounced in the biceps brachii, which was the primary muscle involved in the contraction. CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE: Motor unit behavior is modulated by contraction force and speed, with faster contractions eliciting higher discharge rates and common drive. These findings underscore the neuromechanical adaptability of the motor unit system and have implications for motor function assessment, rehabilitation, and the development of myoelectric interfaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.