Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41219899›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Predicting breast cancer response to neoadjuvant therapy by integrating radiomic and deep-learning features from early-and-peak phases of DCE-MRI.

Yabin Zhang, Jiumei Cai, Chunxiao Cui, Shouliang Qi, Dan Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yabin Zhang *College of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110169, China.
Jiumei Cai *Department of Medical Imaging, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Cancer Hospital of Dalian University of Technology, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning , 110042, China.
Chunxiao CuiDepartment of Breast Imaging, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, 266100, China.
Shouliang QiCollege of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, 110169, China. qisl@bmie.neu.edu.cn.
Dan ZhaoDepartment of Medical Imaging, Cancer Hospital of China Medical University, Cancer Hospital of Dalian University of Technology, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning , 110042, China. zhaodan777@126.com.

Funding

Climbing Fund of National Cancer Center NCC201906B01Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities N2424010-19Shenyang Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Imaging System Technology 19-110-4-10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-invasive prediction of pathological complete response (pCR) in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is crucial for adjusting surgical strategies and optimizing treatment plans. This study aims to develop a predictive model that integrates traditional radiomics and 3D deep learning features from early and peak phases of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) to predict pCR after NAT.

methodsThis retrospective study included 234 breast cancer patients from two hospitals who received neoadjuvant therapy. Dataset 1 (n = 204) was used for model development, and Dataset 2 (n = 30) was used for external validation. Traditional radiomics and 3D deep learning features were extracted from both the whole DCE-MRI image and the tumor region of interest (ROI). Features from different sources were integrated, followed by feature selection using independent sample t-tests and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, and the top ten discriminative features were selected for model training. Logistic regression was used to build predictive models, and their performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves and area under curve (AUC). The DeLong test was used to assess differences between the AUC values of different models, and SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis was employed to examine the relationship between the features of the models and pCR.

resultsFor models using only traditional radiomics features, the combined model integrating early and peak phases of DCE-MRI provided the best pCR prediction. The performance of this combined model was further enhanced by adding 3D deep learning features. The optimal model (RD_EP), which integrated radiomics and deep learning features from early and peak phases of DCE-MRI, achieved AUC values of 0.892 (95% CI: 0.853-0.922) on Dataset 1 and 0.825 (95% CI: 0.713-0.886) on Dataset 2. The DeLong test showed that RD_EP had statistically significant differences compared to other prediction models (p < 0.05). SHAP analysis demonstrated that two radiomics texture features contributed the most to the model.

conclusionIntegrating traditional radiomics and 3D deep learning features from different phases of DCE-MRI can accurately predict pCR to NAT in breast cancer accurately. Multi-phase imaging and diverse features are important to improve predictive accuracy and the constructed model may help guide personalized treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapyAdultAgedContrast MediaDynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansMiddle AgedRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveContrast MediaBreast cancerDeep learningFeature integrationMagnetic resonance imagingNeoadjuvant therapyPathological complete responseRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID41219899
PMCPMC12604257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.