ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Bidirectional relationships between disability and cognitive decline: a 6-year longitudinal study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDisability and cognitive impairment are two significant age-related health issues in older adults. This study aims to simultaneously identify the bidirectional relationship between disability and cognitive impairment, and further pinpoint which one holds a more pivotal role in the relationship.
methodsA total of 628 participants aged 66.0 (SD = 7.3) were retrieved from the 2000 and 2006 Social Environment and Biomarkers of Aging Study (SEBAS). Cognitive function was assessed using the modified Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ). Disability was measured as a count of activity of daily living, instrumental activity of daily living, and mobility scales. Structural equation models with cross-lagged analysis were used to examine the temporal relationship between cognitive impairment and disability over six years.
resultsThe cross-lagged model was well constructed (χ2 (9) = 34.5941, p < 0.0001, RMSEA = 0.0673, CFI = 0.99, SRMR = 0.03). Baseline disability significantly predicted future cognitive impairment (β=-0.25, p < 0.05), and baseline cognition significantly predicted future disability (β=-0.03, p < 0.05). Fisher's Z test indicated a stronger pathway from disability to future cognitive impairment compared to cognitive impairment to future disability (p < 0.001).
conclusionThis longitudinal study suggested that disability and cognition change were bidirectional, with disability showing a stronger impact on future cognitive impairment. Further dynamic investigations and mechanisms between cognitive change and disability are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.