ArticleBMC nursing2025
The role of professional autonomy in a healthy work environment: a mixed-methods study on intensive care nurses.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Associated with Smoking Status and Self-Reported Physical Activity Among Spanish Nursing Professionals: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- The Influence of Achievement Motivation on Nurses' Health-Related Procrastination: The Mediating Role of Social Support.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- The Mediating Role of Psychological Capital in the Relationship Between Professional Nursing Governance, Nurses' Perceived Care Quality and Job Satisfaction.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Predicting Professional Identity Among Chinese Nurses Using the Job Demands-Resources Model: A Comparative Machine-Learning Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionProfessional autonomy is a key element of a healthy work environment, influencing nurses' job satisfaction, decision-making participation, and patient care quality. This study examines the level of professional autonomy among intensive care nurses in Türkiye and explores the individual and institutional factors that shape it.
methodsA concurrent mixed-methods design was used. Quantitative data were collected online from 293 intensive care nurses using the Attitude Towards Professional Autonomy Scale for Nurses. Qualitative data were obtained through semi-structured interviews with 15 nurses selected from the same sample. Theoretical framework was based on Benner's Novice to Expert Model. Quantitative data were analyzed using statistical methods, and qualitative data were analyzed through thematic analysis. Findings were integrated accordingly.
resultsOverall, nurses reported high levels of professional autonomy (X̄=72.29, SD = 10.91). Autonomy scores showed positive correlations with age, education, and professional experience. A negative relationship was found between intention to leave the job and autonomy perception. Qualitative analysis revealed three main themes: (1) nurses' definitions of autonomy and their expectations for the future, (2) the role of education and experience gained in healthy work environments, and (3) the influence of institutional factors and working conditions on autonomy.
conclusionsProfessional autonomy in intensive care nursing is shaped by both personal attributes and systemic factors. Supporting healthy work environments through organizational policies is essential to strengthen nurses' autonomy and improve care quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.