ArticleBMC primary care2025
Patient and provider perspectives of a self-management program for COPD in the context of multimorbidity: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Navigating complexity: nurses' experiences in delivering holistic care to patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Nurse-led pulmonary rehabilitation: a cornerstone for healthy aging in chronic respiratory diseases.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is often associated with comorbidities, which further complicates the impact of the disease. However, most self-management support for COPD do not account for patients' comorbidities. This study is the qualitative evaluation of a novel self-management program for people with COPD in the context of multimorbidity, delivered by practice nurses (PNs) in collaboration with general practitioners (GPs) in Sydney, Australia.
methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 patients, 10 PNs, and seven GPs. The interviews were thematically analysed using a constructivist approach, and further interpreted through the Normalisation Process Theory.
resultsMost patients accepted the program and perceived it as beneficial. Facilitators towards better activation were personalised care and the PNs' counselling approach during the program. Barriers to better health behaviour included personal challenges and comorbidities. Overall, the PNs and GPs found the program to be feasible and beneficial for participating patients. The PNs felt upskilled about COPD, and confident for delivering self-management support, following participation in the study. The main challenge faced by them were managing their existing workload alongside the education sessions.
conclusionsThe findings emphasise the need for tailored, self-management support for people with COPD and comorbidities, and upskilling of the PN's role in general practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.