ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Automated segmentation of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in contrast-enhanced free-breathing 3D-GRE: a comparative study of UNet, nnUNet, and UMamba for tumor delineation.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEsophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is a highly prevalent and aggressive malignancy associated with poor prognosis. Accurate tumor segmentation is critical for the detection and characterization of ESCC. However, manual segmentation remains labor-intensive and time-consuming. Deep learning presents a promising approach for automating this process. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study assessed the performance of three deep learning models-UNet, nnUNet-2D/3D, and UMamba-for ESCC segmentation using contrast-enhanced free-breathing 3DGRE MRI with 1 mm isotropic resolution. The dataset comprised 192 patients, divided into 171 for training and 21 for validation. Manual annotations excluded calcifications and hemorrhage, with maximum tumor cross-sections utilized for 2D model training and full volumetric tumor layers employed for 3D architectures. Segmentation performance was evaluated using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff Distance (HD), and mean surface distance (MSD).
resultUMamba achieved the highest DSC of 0.764, significantly outperforming nnUNet-3D (0.738) and nnUNet-2D (0.702). Additionally, UMamba demonstrated superior boundary delineation, as evidenced by the lowest HD of 5.048 mm and MSD of 1.088 mm. These results highlight the importance of 3D contextual analysis over traditional 2D approaches, as illustrated by the 5.1% improvement in DSC observed with nnUNet-3D compared to nnUNet-2D. Furthermore, the computational efficiency of each model was evaluated, revealing that 3D models exhibited longer inference times than their 2D counterparts.
conclusionUMamba demonstrates superior performance for automated ESCC segmentation on high-resolution MRI, providing a robust tool that has the potential to reduce manual segmentation time and inter-observer variability in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.