ArticleSystematic reviews2025
The mental health outcomes of foster parents following parenting training: systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFoster parents' unique challenges significantly impact their mental health, which in turn influences child well-being and placement stability. Although various intervention programs have been developed to support foster families, research specifically targeting foster parents' mental health as a primary outcome remains limited. Previous reviews have examined parenting stress, leaving a gap in understanding the effectiveness of interventions addressing broader mental health domains such as depression and anxiety. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy of foster parent training programs in improving psychological distress, depression, anxiety, and stress.
methodsThis protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 guidelines and is registered with the Open Science Framework. Information sources will include MEDLINE, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, and Embase, searched from inception to May 2023. An updated search will be conducted prior to final analysis. The review will include randomized controlled trials published in peer-reviewed English-language journals. Eligible interventions will include structured training, educational, or support programs for foster parents. Eligible comparators will include any control condition (e.g., usual care, waitlist, no intervention) or other active interventions. Primary outcomes will include psychological distress, depression, anxiety, and stress. Secondary outcomes will assess family-related psychological outcomes. Risk of bias will be assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2) and certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Data will be synthesized using meta-analysis when appropriate; otherwise, narrative synthesis will be conducted the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guidelines. Subgroup analyses will explore differential effects by theoretical framework and specific mental health outcomes. The review began on May 14, 2023, with an anticipated completion date of August 31, 2025. The study is supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI, Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B), Grant Number JP21H03253. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will evaluate interventions targeting foster parents' mental health across multiple psychological dimensions, surpassing the limited scope of prior studies. The rigorous methodology aims to inform the development of evidence-based mental health support programs for foster parents. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/qzd43 ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.