Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41219806›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2025

Reducing moral distress through interdisciplinary collaboration: the impact of a weekly palliative care and neonatology conference.

Kirthi Devireddy, Riddhi Shukla, Rachel Boren, James E Slaven, Rebecca A Baker, Jayme D Allen, Karen M Moody

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kirthi Devireddy *Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Health Science Center- Houston, Houston, US.
Riddhi Shukla *Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, US.
Rachel BorenDepartment of Pediatrics, MD Anderson Children's Cancer Hospital, Houston, US.
James E SlavenDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, US.
Rebecca A BakerDepartment of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, US.
Jayme D Allen *Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, US.
Karen M Moody *Department of Pediatrics, MD Anderson Children's Cancer Hospital, Houston, US. Kmoody@mdanderson.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMoral distress is the experience of knowing what ethically right action to take, but being unable to act accordingly, due to external factors. It is an experience common to providers working in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) where care for infants, often born at the edges of viability or with other life-limiting diagnoses, includes life and death medical decision-making in the context of uncertain prognoses. Palliative care, which aims to reduce suffering, can assist with staff moral distress by providing space for conversations regarding goals-of-care and end-of-life decision making.

methodsThe palliative care and NICU teams co-developed a weekly, case-based conference to discuss palliative care domains of high-risk newborns including pain and symptom management, goals of care, spiritual support, and psychosocial strengths and challenges. The Moral Distress Thermometer (MDT) and the Moral Distress Scale-Revised (MDS-R) were collected at baseline and at 6- and 12-months post-intervention implementation. Quantitative and qualitative analyses were employed as appropriate.

resultsOne-hundred thirty-seven participants completed both surveys at baseline including 46 physician/advanced practice providers (MD/APPs) and 91 registered nurses/other health professionals (RN/OHPs). There were statistically significant improvements in both the mean MDT scores and the mean MDS-R for the overall cohort and specifically for the RN/OHP group from baseline to 12-months post-intervention. There was a trend towards improvement on these measures among the MD/APP cohort. Qualitative analysis of the free-text responses revealed several themes describing moral distress in the NICU. Themes common to both groups included: futile/non-beneficial care, prognostic uncertainty and prognostic communication, team conflict, institutional constraints and cultural bias. The theme, "End-of-life (EOL) care inconsistent with personal values" emerged among the RN/OHPs. RN/OHPs experiences were shaped by their proximity to the patient and their role as patient advocate. The MD/APP group reported more cognitive and decisional distress.

conclusionA NICU and palliative care-weekly-collaborative conference resulted in significantly decreased moral distress among NICU staff. Qualitative data revealed that both prolonging life with life-sustaining medical therapies (LSMTs) and ending it by withdrawing LSMTs in the context of prognostic uncertainty and institutional constraints creates significant moral distress among staff. Palliative care and NICU programs should consider implementing regular interdisciplinary collaborative conferences to address this distress.

Indexed as

NeonatologyPalliative CareStress, PsychologicalAdultCongresses as TopicEthical DilemmasFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleMiddle AgedMoralsQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesAPPMoral distressNICUNon-beneficial careNursePalliative carePhysician

Identifiers

PMID41219806
PMCPMC12606972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.