ArticleOne health outlook2025
Diversity, equity and inclusion in One Health could crucially support functional health security by fostering prevention, but a change in mindset is needed.
Article in One health outlook, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, One Health (OH) has taken the lead as a systems-oriented method to foster transdisciplinary, multisectoral, and multi-actor action to promote global health security. However, operationalizing the OH approach is difficult since it requires equitable collaboration, communication and information sharing. The One Health High-Level Expert Panel's (OHHLEP) definition of OH lists key underlying principles at its core, which align with principles of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), and establishes that the application of the definition is incomplete without the adoption of these key principles. In this paper, we argue that, by overcoming the barriers that hamper OH adherence to DEI principles, the operationalization of the OH approach could be significantly enhanced to support global health security. We built on the key underlying principles included in the OHHLEP 2022 definition of OH to map barriers preventing its full-scale implementation and to identify inclusive avenues to promote the compliance of OH with its core principles. A scoping review of the literature and consultations with 10 OH professionals from different disciplinary backgrounds, regions of the world and levels of experience were performed. The barriers to the full adherence of OH to its underlying principles that emerged from this study were grouped into five categories: mindset, behaviors and awareness, conceptual, structural, power dynamics, and governance and implementation. Crucially, the engagement of diverse sectors and disciplines notably the environmental and social sciences; of different actors from communities and young people to donors and OH professionals, including the private sector; and of underrepresented groups, such as Indigenous peoples, farmers, fishers, representatives from low- and middle-income countries, and especially women across these groups, all intimately connected to the drivers of emerging health threats, is not only critical for realizing DEI principles in OH, but also to promote more effective prevention strategies and thus enhance global health security.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.