Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41219762›Full record

ReviewRadiation oncology (London, England)2025

Optimizing local control in Ewing sarcoma: a critical discussion of radiotherapy and surgical approaches with proposed decision-making algorithm; a narrative review.

Khodamorad Jamshidi, Hamed Naghizadeh, Khalil Kargar Shooroki, Aidin Arabzadeh, Mehdi Karami, Erfan Khosravi, Amir Mohammad Arefpour, Seyyed Saeed Khabiri

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Khodamorad JamshidiBone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hamed NaghizadehJoint Reconstruction Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Khalil Kargar ShoorokiBone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Aidin ArabzadehJoint Reconstruction Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mehdi KaramiBone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Erfan KhosraviJoint Reconstruction Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Amir Mohammad ArefpourDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyyed Saeed KhabiriBone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. saeed.khabiri@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8906-7660

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ewing sarcoma (ES) is a rare, aggressive bone malignancy where local control remains central to cure. Modern systemic therapy has improved 5-year overall survival for localized disease to ~ 70%, but outcomes vary by tumor site, size, and patient age. Surgery offers durable control when negative margins (R0) can be achieved without major functional loss, while radiotherapy (RT) is essential for unresectable tumors, close/positive margins, or anatomically challenging locations. This narrative review critically appraises the efficacy, limitations, and late effects of RT and surgery, synthesizing data from cooperative group analyses, retrospective series, and contemporary guidelines. Advances in RT, including IMRT/VMAT, proton beam therapy, and precise target delineation, have enhanced tumor coverage and reduced toxicity, though late effects (growth disturbance, fractures, endocrine sequelae, and secondary malignancies) remain concerns, particularly in children. Surgical outcomes depend heavily on margin status and anatomical site, with adjuvant RT improving control in R1/R2 or pelvic cases. Based on this synthesis, a pragmatic, risk-adapted decision algorithm is proposed: surgery is preferred for achievable R0 resection with acceptable function; RT is indicated when resection is morbid or margins compromised; adjuvant RT is reserved for positive/close margins or high-risk sites; and whole-lung irradiation remains selective for lung-dominant remission. Multidisciplinary decision-making, adherence to standardized RT protocols, and long-term survivorship monitoring are emphasized. Future research should prioritize prospective, multi-institutional trials with uniform outcome definitions and extended follow-up, aiming to refine modality selection, minimize late effects, and improve quality of life. This framework provides a transparent, margin-anchored, anatomy-informed pathway for optimizing local control while preserving long-term outcomes in ES patients.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBone NeoplasmsSarcoma, EwingDecision MakingHumansRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedDecision-making algorithmEwing sarcomaNarrative reviewOrthopedic oncologyRadiotherapySurgical resection

Identifiers

PMID41219762
PMCPMC12606936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.