ReviewRadiation oncology (London, England)2025
Optimizing local control in Ewing sarcoma: a critical discussion of radiotherapy and surgical approaches with proposed decision-making algorithm; a narrative review.
Review in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- First case description of a highly aggressive thoracopulmonary primitive neuroectodermal tumor in a Moroccan adult male.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ewing sarcoma (ES) is a rare, aggressive bone malignancy where local control remains central to cure. Modern systemic therapy has improved 5-year overall survival for localized disease to ~ 70%, but outcomes vary by tumor site, size, and patient age. Surgery offers durable control when negative margins (R0) can be achieved without major functional loss, while radiotherapy (RT) is essential for unresectable tumors, close/positive margins, or anatomically challenging locations. This narrative review critically appraises the efficacy, limitations, and late effects of RT and surgery, synthesizing data from cooperative group analyses, retrospective series, and contemporary guidelines. Advances in RT, including IMRT/VMAT, proton beam therapy, and precise target delineation, have enhanced tumor coverage and reduced toxicity, though late effects (growth disturbance, fractures, endocrine sequelae, and secondary malignancies) remain concerns, particularly in children. Surgical outcomes depend heavily on margin status and anatomical site, with adjuvant RT improving control in R1/R2 or pelvic cases. Based on this synthesis, a pragmatic, risk-adapted decision algorithm is proposed: surgery is preferred for achievable R0 resection with acceptable function; RT is indicated when resection is morbid or margins compromised; adjuvant RT is reserved for positive/close margins or high-risk sites; and whole-lung irradiation remains selective for lung-dominant remission. Multidisciplinary decision-making, adherence to standardized RT protocols, and long-term survivorship monitoring are emphasized. Future research should prioritize prospective, multi-institutional trials with uniform outcome definitions and extended follow-up, aiming to refine modality selection, minimize late effects, and improve quality of life. This framework provides a transparent, margin-anchored, anatomy-informed pathway for optimizing local control while preserving long-term outcomes in ES patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.