Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41219745›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2025

Hyperspectral-based classification of individual wheat plants into fine-scale reproductive stages.

Yiting Xie, Stuart J Roy, Rhiannon K Schilling, Bettina Berger, Huajian Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yiting XieUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. yiting.xie@adelaide.edu.au.
Stuart J RoyUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Rhiannon K SchillingUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Bettina BergerUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Huajian LiuUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. huajian.liu@adelaide.edu.au.

Funding

ARC Training Centre for Accelerated Future Crops Development IC210100047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Field trials play an essential role in developing genetically modified and genome-edited biotechnology plants, as they assess plant growth, yield, and potential unintended effects. Australian biotechnology field trials are regulated by federal protocols that mandate accurate forecasting of flowering times. Currently, this relies on labour-intensive and subjective visual field inspections of individual wheat plants at defined growth stages (Zadoks growth stages Z37, Z39, and Z41). To enable automatic forecasting, hyperspectral and red-green-blue (RGB) images were captured in the greenhouse, and hyperspectral reflectance data were acquired in a semi-natural environment. Support Vector Machine classification achieved F1 scores (0.832) for pre-anthesis growth stage classification through the combined use and systematic comparison of three spectral transformations, including Standard Normal Variate, Hyper-hue, or Principal Component Analysis, which together outperformed reliance on any single transformation. After feature selection, F1 scores (0.752) could be achieved with only five wavelengths. Furthermore, the SNV transformation demonstrated robust performance under limited training conditions, maintaining high classification accuracy and strong generalizability across varying data sizes. These findings highlight the effectiveness of transformation-enriched data and optimized feature selection for accurate growth stage classification, providing a low-cost approach to reduce manual inspection burdens and strengthen biosafety during biotechnology field trial practices.

Indexed as

Data transformationFine-scale growth stage classificationHyperspectral sensingIndividual wheat phenotypingReproductive development

Identifiers

PMID41219745
PMCPMC12606948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.