ArticlePlant methods2025
Hyperspectral-based classification of individual wheat plants into fine-scale reproductive stages.
Article in Plant methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Field trials play an essential role in developing genetically modified and genome-edited biotechnology plants, as they assess plant growth, yield, and potential unintended effects. Australian biotechnology field trials are regulated by federal protocols that mandate accurate forecasting of flowering times. Currently, this relies on labour-intensive and subjective visual field inspections of individual wheat plants at defined growth stages (Zadoks growth stages Z37, Z39, and Z41). To enable automatic forecasting, hyperspectral and red-green-blue (RGB) images were captured in the greenhouse, and hyperspectral reflectance data were acquired in a semi-natural environment. Support Vector Machine classification achieved F1 scores (0.832) for pre-anthesis growth stage classification through the combined use and systematic comparison of three spectral transformations, including Standard Normal Variate, Hyper-hue, or Principal Component Analysis, which together outperformed reliance on any single transformation. After feature selection, F1 scores (0.752) could be achieved with only five wavelengths. Furthermore, the SNV transformation demonstrated robust performance under limited training conditions, maintaining high classification accuracy and strong generalizability across varying data sizes. These findings highlight the effectiveness of transformation-enriched data and optimized feature selection for accurate growth stage classification, providing a low-cost approach to reduce manual inspection burdens and strengthen biosafety during biotechnology field trial practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.