ArticleBMC medicine2025
Clinical-genetic profiles and risk prediction model in childhood restrictive cardiomyopathy: a national cohort study of China.
Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical and Echocardiographic Determinants of Moderate Heart Failure in Children with Acyanotic Congenital Heart Disease: A Retrospective Single-Center Exploratory Prediction Modelling Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Knowledge graph visualization and retrospective analysis of genetic research on pediatric cardiomyopathy (2000-2024).Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) in children is limited, and currently, no prognostic model is available for assessing risk stratification in pediatric RCM. The authors elaborated on the clinical and genetic characteristics of pediatric RCM and developed a prediction model to assess the 1-year risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), aiding in determining the optimal timing for heart transplantation (HTx).
methodsThis multicenter retrospective cohort study collected data on children with RCM from 14 centers in China, with patient enrollment from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2022, and follow-up concluding on August 1, 2023. It analyzed clinical and genetic characteristics and followed patients longitudinally for the development of MACE (including cardiac death, HTx, or equivalent events). A logistic regression model was developed to predict MACE one year post-diagnosis, with internal validation using bootstrapping. The model's performance was evaluated in terms of its discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility.
resultsThe study included 185 children with a median diagnosis age of 5.4 years (IQR, 3.1-9.4), and 110 (59%) were male. Significant heart failure was the primary clinical feature. TNNI3 mutations were present in 61% of cases, the most common in pediatric RCM. During the follow-up period, 114 patients (62%) experienced MACE, with the median MACE-free survival time for the entire cohort being 2.1 years post-diagnosis (IQR, 0.6-5.4). A prediction model was developed to estimate the one-year risk of MACE using four easily accessible clinical parameters: heart failure classification, brain natriuretic peptide levels, cardiac troponin levels, and a modified score for ST-segment deviation. Internal validation with bootstrapping confirmed accuracy, showing an optimism-adjusted C statistic of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.72-0.85) and a Brier score of 0.17 (95% CI, 0.14-0.21), with a calibration slope of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.63-1.27). Decision curve analysis indicated high net benefit across HTx treatment thresholds from 8.5% to 78.3%.
conclusionsThis model utilizes accessible clinical parameters to assess individual risk for MACE in pediatric RCM, potentially improving precision in healthcare strategies and supporting more informed clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.