Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41219731›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2025

Response of continuous cropping cowpea and root-zone soil to composite microbial agents: plant growth promotion and nitrogen-fixing bacterial community regulation.

Jie Zhu, Jiachen Chen, Jie Zhang, Qiangchuan Hou, Kai Luo, Yuqi Li, Peng Feng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jie Zhu *Institute of Vegetables, Xiangyang Academy of Agricultural Science, Xiangyang, 441057, Hubei Province, China.
Jiachen Chen *Institute of Advanced Agricultural Science, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, 441053, Hubei Province, China.
Jie ZhangInstitute of Vegetables, Xiangyang Academy of Agricultural Science, Xiangyang, 441057, Hubei Province, China.
Qiangchuan HouSchool of Food Science and Chemical Engineering, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, 441053, Hubei Province, China.
Kai LuoInstitute of Advanced Agricultural Science, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, 441053, Hubei Province, China.
Yuqi LiInstitute of Advanced Agricultural Science, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang, 441053, Hubei Province, China. yuqi.li@hbuas.edu.cn.
Peng FengInstitute of Vegetables, Xiangyang Academy of Agricultural Science, Xiangyang, 441057, Hubei Province, China. nkyky701@163.com.

Funding

Xiangyang Innovation and Development Joint Fund Project of Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation 2025AFD077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuous cropping obstacle of cowpea is an urgent problem to be solved for its sustainable production. A field experiment was performed from April to June 2024 to study the effects of four commercially microbial agents on the growth and yield of continuously cropping cowpea plants and nitrogen-fixing bacterial community structure in root-zone soil by high-throughput sequencing technology. Four commercially microbial agents used were BS (Bacillus subtilis), TH (Trichoderma harzianum), AB (Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Brevibacillus laterosporus, Bacillus mucilaginosus and Enterobacter ludwigii), and CP (T. harzianum, B. amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus licheniformis and B. laterosporus). The results showed that four microbial agents enhanced soil organic matter, nitrate nitrogen and available potassium content in soil. The application of BS resulted in an increase in the relative abundance of Proteobacteria in root-zone soil of cowpea, while Actinobacteria and Firmicutes showed a downward trend compared to the control (CK). The treatments of BS, TH and AB significantly increased the relative abundance of Bradyrhizobium in soil by 109.4%, 38.5%, and 20.6% compared with CK, respectively. Furthermore, TH and CP increased the relative abundance of Halorhodospira in soil by 47.4% and 98.5%, respectively. The yield of cowpea plants increased by 9.6% with CP treatment compared to CK (P < 0.05). The BS treatment significantly promoted the main stem width of cowpea plants. The AB treatment enhanced protein, vitamin C and organic acid contents in cowpea plants. Overall, CP treatment is a better choice, as it has potential advantages over other agents in terms of cowpea growth and yield, and can improve the structure of the soil nitrogen-fixing bacterial community.

Indexed as

Crop ProductionNitrogen-Fixing BacteriaSoil MicrobiologyVignaMicrobiotaNitrogenNitrogen FixationPlant RootsSoilNitrogenSoilContinuous cropping obstacleCowpea plantsMicrobial agentsNitrogen-fixing bacteria

Identifiers

PMID41219731
PMCPMC12606975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.