ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025
Bacteraemia due to E.coli in urinary tract infections in adults: a prospective epidemiological study following implementation of guidelines in a regional hospital.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Antimicrobial Resistance and ESBL-Associated Predictors Among Uropathogens: A 2019-2024 Isolate-Level Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral countries have established action plans for antibiotic stewardship programs (ASPs), which recognise the clinical and public health issues of antimicrobial resistance. We evaluated the impact of a multimodal ASP, implemented in 2017 to improve urinary source E.coli bacteraemia in a secondary care hospital in Catalonia, Spain.
methodsProspective, post-intervention, epidemiological study in a single hospital in Catalonia. Patients were included if they were aged ≥ 18 years, were admitted to the hospital for any cause between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2022, and had urinary-source E.coli bacteraemia. The primary endpoint was adherence to antimicrobial treatment guidelines for urinary-source E.coli bacteraemia. Secondary endpoints included, appropriate antimicrobial treatment use based on in vitro sensitivity; the degree of error in appropriate use of empirical antimicrobial treatments by guideline adherence (yes/no); and the percentage of E. coli antibiotic resistance in these patients.
resultsOf the 297 patients with urinary-source E.coli bacteraemia, the majority were female (57.9%), and the mean (SD) age was 79.0 (16.9) years. Most urinary-source E.coli bacteraemias were community-acquired (n = 194, 65.3%) vs. healthcare system- (n = 78, 26.3%) or hospital- (n = 25, 8.4%) acquired. Adherence rates to antimicrobial treatment guidelines were high across all years (91.4%; range 83.0% to 97.8%), as was the appropriateness of use based on in vitro sensitivity (93.0%; range: 89.4% to 97.8%). The degree of error in appropriate use of empirical antimicrobial treatments was 3.0% (range: 0% to 6.5%) when guidelines were followed and 50.0% (33.3% to 66.7%) when guidelines were not followed. The percentage of urinary-source E.coli bacteraemia which were resistant to treatment with quinolones (44.7% vs. 22.4%; p = 0.014) and ESBLs (21.3% vs. 12.2%; p = 0.058) reduced significantly from 2017 to 2022. No cases of carbapenem resistance occurred.
conclusionsThis prospective, single centre study reports a high level of appropriate antimicrobial use, based on both guideline recommendations and in vitro sensitivity testing. Our ASP has been applied successfully over 6 years, resulting in improvements in the empirical antimicrobial treatment of urinary-source E.coli bacteraemia, and a reduction in antimicrobial resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.