Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41219699›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

The parity paradox: does number of children (parity) influence breast cancer mortality across the life course?

Ronit Pinchas Mizrachi, Dan Bouhnik

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ronit Pinchas MizrachiJerusalem College of Technology, Jerusalem, Israel. pinchas.ronit@gmail.com.
Dan BouhnikJerusalem College of Technology, Jerusalem, Israel.

Funding

Israel Academic College 112019Jerusalem College of Technology 012022RP
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While parity (number of births) has been extensively studied in relation to breast cancer risk, its age-specific impact on breast cancer mortality remains unclear. We examined how the relationship between parity and breast cancer mortality rates varies across age groups. This retrospective cohort study was based on 894,608 Israeli women born between 1940 and 1960 and followed for 31 years (1990-2020). Employing an age-stratified approach (30-49, 50-64, and 65-80 years), we used Cox regression to examine the associations between number of children (0, 1-2, and ≥ 3) and breast cancer mortality rates, adjusting for sociodemographic variables and calendar year of entry into each age group. Amongst the 30-49 bracket, those with 1-2 children (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.656; 99% confidence interval [CI] 1.349-2.033) or ≥ 3 children (HR = 1.551; 99% CI 1.271-1.893) had a greater breast cancer mortality risk than childless women. In the 50-64 bracket, these differences disappeared after adjustment (HR = 1.071; 99% CI 0.949-1.209 and HR = 0.935; 99% CI 0.830-1.054, respectively). In the 65-80 bracket, those with 1-2 children continued to exhibit an elevated risk (HR = 1.237; 99% CI 1.045-1.466), no significant difference existing between women with ≥ 3 children and childless women (HR = 0.989; 99% CI 0.834-1.173). An age-dependent relationship thus obtained between parity and breast cancer mortality. These findings highlight the need for age-tailored approaches to breast cancer risk assessment and prevention.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsParityAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHumansIsraelMiddle AgedPregnancyProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAge-stratified analysisBreast cancerLife course cohort studyMortalityParity

Identifiers

PMID41219699
PMCPMC12606814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.