ArticleBMC cancer2025
The parity paradox: does number of children (parity) influence breast cancer mortality across the life course?
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tumor Characteristics and Event Free Survival in Older and Younger Women with Early Breast Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Correction: The parity paradox: does number of children (parity) influence breast cancer mortality across the life course?BMC cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While parity (number of births) has been extensively studied in relation to breast cancer risk, its age-specific impact on breast cancer mortality remains unclear. We examined how the relationship between parity and breast cancer mortality rates varies across age groups. This retrospective cohort study was based on 894,608 Israeli women born between 1940 and 1960 and followed for 31 years (1990-2020). Employing an age-stratified approach (30-49, 50-64, and 65-80 years), we used Cox regression to examine the associations between number of children (0, 1-2, and ≥ 3) and breast cancer mortality rates, adjusting for sociodemographic variables and calendar year of entry into each age group. Amongst the 30-49 bracket, those with 1-2 children (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.656; 99% confidence interval [CI] 1.349-2.033) or ≥ 3 children (HR = 1.551; 99% CI 1.271-1.893) had a greater breast cancer mortality risk than childless women. In the 50-64 bracket, these differences disappeared after adjustment (HR = 1.071; 99% CI 0.949-1.209 and HR = 0.935; 99% CI 0.830-1.054, respectively). In the 65-80 bracket, those with 1-2 children continued to exhibit an elevated risk (HR = 1.237; 99% CI 1.045-1.466), no significant difference existing between women with ≥ 3 children and childless women (HR = 0.989; 99% CI 0.834-1.173). An age-dependent relationship thus obtained between parity and breast cancer mortality. These findings highlight the need for age-tailored approaches to breast cancer risk assessment and prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.