Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41219698›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Changes over time in social inequality in adult self-rated health: the case of Norway 2002-2019.

Tord Finne Vedøy, Liv Grøtvedt, Astri Syse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tord Finne VedøyDepartment of Alcohol, Tobacco and Drugs, Division of Mental and Physical Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Liv GrøtvedtDepartment of Health and Inequality, Division of Mental and Physical Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Astri SyseDepartment of Health and Inequality and Centre for Evaluation of Public Health Initiatives, Division of Mental and Physical Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway. astri.syse@fhi.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFindings on how social inequality in self-rated health (SRH) has changed over time are not uniform. To inform public health policies aimed at reducing unwarranted social differences in health, we examine time trends in relative and absolute associations between SRH and three different socioeconomic measures using Norway as a case.

methodsSix rounds (2002–2019) of repeated national, cross-sectional, data from Statistics Norway’s Survey on Living Conditions (response rates 57–70%) were linked to register information on socioeconomic measures (education, household income and occupation). A set of logistic regression models of good SRH (GSRH) with blockwise inclusion of predictors were employed to 29,012 adults (25–66 years). Absolute and relative differences in GSRH across education, income and occupation were calculated across survey years, net of other sociodemographic characteristics and risk factors.

resultsRegardless of model, the probability of reporting GSRH was high (around 80%) across sex for most years. Considering only statistically significant results, men with the short education had a 2-4% points lower probability of GSRH than men with long education, across years. The time trend in income differences was also stable, albeit the difference between the highest and lowest quintile was larger (around 7% points). Those outside the labor force were substantially less likely (23% points) to report GSRH compared to men in high skilled white-collar occupations. Among women, GSRH was 6% points lower among those with short compared to long education, and 8% points lower in the 1st compared to the 5th income quintile. Being outside the labour force was associated with a 28% points lower probability of GSRH among women. Otherwise, there were minor differences in GSRH between occupational groups. On a relative scale (percent difference), differences between socioeconomic groups were slightly more pronounced, but with similar trends for men and women.

conclusionsIrrespective of socioeconomic measure, social inequalities in SRH have remained remarkably stable over time across socioeconomic measures in Norway, in both absolute and relative terms. The national strategy may have worked to prevent increasing social inequalities in health, but system changes and further actions appear warranted to reduce existing differences.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Self EvaluationSocioeconomic Disparities in HealthAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwaySelf ReportSocioeconomic FactorsEducationHealthIncomeInequalityNorwayOccupationSelf-ratedSocioeconomicSurvey

Identifiers

PMID41219698
PMCPMC12606821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.