SynthesisDigestive diseases and sciences2026
Fistula Outcomes After Seton Removal in Patients with Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile setons are commonly used in the multidisciplinary care of patients with perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease (PFCD), fistula outcomes after their removal are poorly understood. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to evaluate fistula outcomes after seton removal in patients with PFCD.
methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched until December 2023. We included studies reporting fistula outcomes after seton removal in PFCD. We used a hierarchy to stratify patients into one of three treatment categories: medical therapy alone, surgical closure, or cell/plasma-based therapy. Fistula outcomes were reported as weighted proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
resultsEighty-two studies (n = 2441 patients) were analyzed. Mean/median seton duration varied widely (2 to 70 weeks). Pooled estimates (95% CI) of fistula outcomes after seton removal for patients treated in the medical therapy alone, surgical closure, or cell/plasma-based therapy categories were, respectively, 64% (54-75), 65% (52-78), and 71% (65-77) for fistula remission; 30% (22-38), 29% (16-42), and 20% (15-25) for recurrence; 15% (8-22), 11% (4-20), and 14% (8-21) for abscess formation; and 26% (18-35), 23% (17-29), and 13% (2-26) for surgical re-intervention. Fistula outcome estimates remained stable in multiple sensitivity analyses. Limited studies directly compared fistula outcomes based on seton duration, yielding inconsistent results.
conclusionsThis systematic review provides comprehensive estimates of fistula outcomes after seton removal and demonstrates substantial variability in seton duration. Future research is required to determine the optimal duration of setons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41219674What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.