Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41219658›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026

Aperiodic neural activity during speech comprehension in aging: Insights into cognitive effort.

Sarah J Woods, Jack W Silcox, Brennan R Payne

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sarah J WoodsDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, 380 S 1530 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. sarah.woods@psych.utah.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6691-7175
Jack W SilcoxDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, 380 S 1530 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Brennan R PayneDepartment of Psychology, University of Utah, 380 S 1530 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Though largely ignored in the past, aperiodic (i.e., irregular, non-oscillatory) activity is emerging as an important element of the electroencephalography (EEG) signal. Certain characteristics of broadband aperiodic activity have been shown to reflect dynamic neurophysiological states that are sensitive to cognitive task demands and predictive of individual differences in cognitive capacity. In the current study, we test whether aperiodic neural activity can be used to index cognitive effort during speech comprehension in older listeners. Older adults with varying hearing acuity (N = 48) listened to sentences in quiet and in background noise while EEG was recorded. Consistent with listening effort, aperiodic neural activity was sensitive to increased acoustic challenge such that the aperiodic slope flattened and offset was reduced with increasing noise. Moreover, noise-induced changes in aperiodic activity were greater for older adults with poorer hearing acuity. In an age-comparative analysis using additional data from young normal hearing adults (N = 35), age-related reductions in aperiodic slope and offset were observed, replicating past work, while sensitivity to background noise was observed in both age groups. These findings highlight the importance of considering aperiodic EEG activity in assessing cognitive listening effort specifically, and in challenging cognitive tasks more generally.

Indexed as

AgingBrainCognitionComprehensionSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNoiseYoung AdultAgingElectroencephalographyListening effortSpeech comprehension

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.