ReviewOecologia2025
Macroinvertebrates, a forgotten player in the nutrient dynamics of riparian buffer zones.
Review in Oecologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
One of the main causes of poor ecological surface water quality in Europe is nutrient enrichment due to agricultural activities. Riparian buffer zones, the vegetative zones between agricultural land and surface waters, have proven to retain and remove nutrients, yet with highly variable effectivity. So far, the role of invertebrates as an explanation for this variability remains severely overlooked. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the contribution of invertebrates to nutrient retention and removal processes of riparian buffer zones. Only four articles on invertebrate activity in riparian buffer zones were found, which focused on their role in denitrification and nitrate leaching, ignoring the variety of other processes that contribute to buffer zone effectivity. Therefore, knowledge on the role of invertebrates available from other ecosystems was synthesized and extrapolated to riparian buffer zones. It is concluded that the effects of invertebrates on nutrient retention and removal processes often depend on specific species or functional groups, the intensity of bioturbation and feeding activity, as well as on the soil and sediment characteristics. We have made a strong case here that these same invertebrate-environment interactions are also likely to occur in buffer zone ecosystems, mediating nutrient dynamics. To efficiently tackle the most pressing knowledge gaps, the three most important components of future research should be: (1) the quantification of species-specific contribution of invertebrates, (2) the effects of lumbricid communities, and (3) the effects of their large-scale behavior on nutrient dynamics in hydrologically dynamic riparian buffer zones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41219555What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.