Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41219486›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Common electrophysiological signatures of relative magnitude in both space and time.

Estelle Mieulet, Kamila Smigasiewicz, Inga Korolczuk, Laurence Casini, Franck Vidal, Jennifer T Coull

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Estelle MieuletCentre for Research in Psychology & Neuroscience (UMR 7077), Aix-Marseille Université & CNRS, Marseille, France.
Kamila SmigasiewiczCentre for Research in Psychology & Neuroscience (UMR 7077), Aix-Marseille Université & CNRS, Marseille, France.
Inga KorolczukDepartment of Psychology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Laurence CasiniCentre for Research in Psychology & Neuroscience (UMR 7077), Aix-Marseille Université & CNRS, Marseille, France.
Franck VidalCentre for Research in Psychology & Neuroscience (UMR 7077), Aix-Marseille Université & CNRS, Marseille, France.
Jennifer T CoullCentre for Research in Psychology & Neuroscience (UMR 7077), Aix-Marseille Université & CNRS, Marseille, France. jennifer.coull@univ-amu.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Duration processing can be indexed by the amplitude of two electrophysiological potentials, the contingent negative variation (CNV) and the late positive component (LPC). When a currently elapsing event becomes longer than that of a memorized standard, CNV amplitude begins to resolve back to baseline even if the event is not yet over, and LPC amplitude, evoked by event offset, is reduced. Using electroencephalography in 30 human participants, we examined whether these patterns were unique to explicit duration judgements or might also be observed during spatial judgements. Two dynamic visual stimuli were presented consecutively on each trial. The relative duration (temporal task) or distance (spatial task) of the second stimulus was compared to the first. Confirming prior findings, CNV dynamics and LPC amplitude reflected the relative duration of the two stimuli. However, this occurred only when duration was task-relevant during the temporal task, not when it was irrelevant during the spatial task. Moreover, CNV and LPC activity indexed relative distance only when distance was task-relevant in the spatial (not temporal) task. Together these results suggest that CNV and LPC dynamics reflect domain-general mechanisms for processing the magnitude of task-relevant stimulus features, whether in the temporal (duration) or spatial (distance) dimension.

Indexed as

Contingent Negative VariationSpace PerceptionTime PerceptionAdultElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationReaction TimeYoung AdultDecision-makingMagnitudeP300SMATime perceptionTiming

Identifiers

PMID41219486
PMCPMC12606332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.