ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
Machine learning-based prediction of pediatric scoliosis using foot pressure and body angles.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Algorithms to Clinics: Recent Progress in AI for Scoliosis Diagnosis and Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to analyze the key features of scoliosis based on children's foot pressure and body angle data and to develop a predictive model to support early screening for scoliosis in pediatric populations.
methodsData were collected from 5970 primary school students in Kunming. After excluding incomplete and anomalous samples, 3723 students were included. Machine learning algorithms, including Logistic Regression(LR), Support Vector Machine(SVM), Random Forest(RF), and LightGBM, were employed to construct classification models. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, ROC curves, AUC, and other metrics. The optimal model was selected based on model performance comparisons, and SHAP (Shapley Additive exPlanations) interpretability analysis was conducted.
resultsStatistical analysis revealed significant differences between children with scoliosis and healthy controls in toe out angle and Center of Pressure (COP) sway area. The LightGBM model outperformed others with an AUC of 0.971, significantly higher than LR (0.566), SVM (0.723), and RF (0.899). The LightGBM model also reached an accuracy of 92%. SHAP analysis identified that the toe out angle and COP sway area were the most important features for scoliosis prediction. This finding is consistent with the two sets of differential features identified in the statistical analysis.
conclusionThis study developed a predictive model for pediatric scoliosis using foot pressure and body posture data, demonstrating high accuracy and efficiency in predicting scoliosis. The study further confirmed the key role of foot pressure distribution and body posture features in scoliosis prediction, providing a new technical approach and reference for early screening of scoliosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41219479What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.