ArticleScientific reports2025
Novel proof of concept assay for rapid, simplified non-invasive fetal RhD screening.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The RhD antigen is a key component of the Rh blood group system and is highly immunogenic, posing risks for RhD-negative pregnant women. While anti-D prophylaxis prevents maternal alloimmunization, concerns regarding availability, overuse, and universal effectiveness persist. Recent advances in non-invasive fetal RHD genotyping have shown potential to reduce unnecessary interventions. This study presents a new non-invasive fetal RhD screening method using cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and dry chemistry quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) with fluorescence measurements of three RHD exons, aimed at enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of RHD genotyping and improving clinical decision-making. We evaluated this new method using cfDNA extracted from plasma samples of 28 RhD-negative women carrying singleton pregnancies. The 20µL cfDNA samples correctly identified all 18 RhD-positive pregnancies and 9/10 RhD-negative pregnancy samples. Our study provides proof of concept that the cfDNA and dry chemistry qPCR method for fetal RHD genotyping is feasible, as it achieved 100% sensitivity. Despite the small sample size, these findings support the use of RHD genotyping as a precise and effective alternative or complement to anti-D prophylaxis, offering improved risk management and care for pregnant women worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.