Trial reportScientific reports2025
Exploring the predictive power of iTBS induced prefrontal excitability using concurrent TBS/fNIRS.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The effect of a single session intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) on dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) function remains uncertain. Additionally, the clinical relevance of predicting DLPFC function through iTBS-induced DLPFC excitability has not been investigated. To address these gaps, concurrent iTBS/functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was employed. Thirty healthy participants were recruited in this randomized, sham-controlled, crossover study. Working memory performance, a core function of the DLPFC, was assessed using 3-back task before and at five subsequent timepoints following iTBS. Prefrontal hemoglobin concentrations were measured concurrently by fNIRS throughout the whole procedure. No significant differences in post-stimulation 3-back task performance were observed between active and sham stimulation. Nevertheless, a significant decrease in iTBS-induced oxygen-hemoglobin (HbO) change was observed in the active group compared to the sham group. However, iTBS-induced HbO changes did not significantly predict working memory performance at any timepoint. These results reveal that a single iTBS session of the left DLPFC results in significant immediate cortical excitability changes. However, these changes do not translate into improved working memory compared to sham stimulation and iTBS-induced prefrontal excitability does not appear to predict subsequent working memory performance following a single session iTBS. Nevertheless, the potential predictive power of iTBS-induced prefrontal excitability in symptom changes of rTMS for depression is still worthy of an investigation given that such symptom changes are thought to result from rTMS effects. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to explore whether iTBS-induced excitability changes could serve as an imaging marker for clinical treatment response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.