Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41219366›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Daylighting assessment of window layouts and architectural elements in early design stages.

Cong Thanh Do, Nguyen Thi Thuy Dung, Ying-Chieh Chan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cong Thanh DoFaculty of Architecture and Planning, Hanoi University of Civil Engineering, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Nguyen Thi Thuy DungFaculty of Architecture and Planning, Hanoi University of Civil Engineering, Hanoi, Vietnam.
Ying-Chieh ChanDepartment of Civil Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan. ychan@ntu.edu.tw.

Funding

National Taiwan University 113L893703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While window design evolves throughout the design process, establishing an initial concept is crucial. Architects often prioritize aesthetics when deciding on window layouts, yet considering daylighting performance early can significantly improve occupant health, well-being, and productivity. This study conducts a parametric analysis to assess the daylighting performance of different window layouts and architectural elements, including room layout, orientation, window to wall ratio, and visible transmittance (VT). Five window layouts were examined: square, rectangular, horizontal, vertical, and window wall. A total of 1,872 cases was simulated for Hanoi's climate using Ladybug Tools. Results reveal substantial differences in daylighting performance among the layouts. Rectangular windows provide deeper illumination, while square windows distribute light more broadly near the window. Horizontal windows achieve greater daylight availability than vertical windows. Appropriately designed room dimensions and VT allow horizontal or vertical windows to maximize spatial daylight autonomy (sDA), while the window-wall configuration offers no substantial advantage. Window to wall ratio and VT are critical variables, capable of shifting sDA from 40 to 100%. Orientation also affects daylighting, with sDA differences of up to 15% between north- and west-facing windows. Based on these findings, early-stage window design guidelines are proposed to support effective daylighting performance.

Indexed as

DaylightingEarly designLadybug toolsParametric studyWindow layouts

Identifiers

PMID41219366
PMCPMC12606118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.