ArticleScientific reports2025
Analysis of the EMHD nanofluid flow for geothermal pipelines using physics-driven deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electromagnetohydrodynamic flow and heat transfer of a dusty hybrid nanofluid over a rotating disk in a porous medium.Discover nano · 2026Article
- Machine learning forecasting of electroosmotic MHD flow of a buoyancy-driven ternary nanofluid in converging and diverging channels.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years data-driven machine learning techniques attract the attention of researchers in analyzing many complex systems. This study introduces a novel unsupervised deep neural network approach to predict the temperature and velocity behaviour of electro-magneto-hydrodynamics hybrid nanofluid flow for geothermal pipelines application.The exceptional flow and thermal characteristics of hybrid nanofluids making them ideal for use in geothermal energy extraction applications. The dynamics of hybrid nanofluid flow through a pipe are examined using a third-grade sodium alginate model, which has a lot of potential for geothermal applications. The copper oxide (CuO) and zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles make up the nanofluid. It is also investigated how the flow dynamics are affected by electric and magnetic fields. The energy equation takes into account the effects of Joule heating and viscous dissipation as the fully developed incompressible fluid passes through the pipe. Consequently, an unsupervised deep neural network (DNN) method is used to predict the dynamics of nonlinear differential equations (DEs). The accuracy of the deep neural network ranges from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] across different cases. The velocity profile exhibits a clear symmetrical pattern and is found to be significantly influenced by both the electric field and the thermal Grashof number. The overall thermal profile along the pipe's length decreases as a result of the nanoparticles. Additionally, lowering the pressure has a similar effect on both velocities. This study makes important contributions to the comprehension of the intricate dynamics of electro-magneto-hydrodynamics hybrid nanofluid flow, thereby laying a foundational framework for optimizing thermodynamic systems in geothermal. The findings of this research hold significant practical implications for the design and engineering of systems aimed at energy conservation and improved heat transfer efficiency in geothermal pipelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.