Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41219343›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An improved GPT2-based joint event extraction method with position expansion and knowledge augmentation.

Tonghui An, Zhenling Zhang, Yangli Jia, Ruchao Jia, Maria Papadopoulou, Christophe Roche

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tonghui AnSchool of Computer Science, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, 252059, China.
Zhenling ZhangSchool of Computer Science, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, 252059, China.
Yangli JiaSchool of Computer Science, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, 252059, China. jiayangli@lcu.edu.cn.
Ruchao JiaSchool of Computer Science, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, 252059, China.
Maria PapadopoulouTALOS Research Center in AI for SSH, University of Crete, Gallos Campus, Rethymno, 74100, GR, Greece.
Christophe RocheTALOS Research Center in AI for SSH, University of Crete, Gallos Campus, Rethymno, 74100, GR, Greece.

Funding

Fund Project of Liaocheng University 318052126National Natural Science Foundation of China 81973695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the rapid development of the Internet and social media, massive amounts of unstructured data have emerged, making event extraction increasingly important for information retrieval. In the financial domain, challenges such as long texts, redundant content, and complex structures hinder extraction tasks. To address this, we propose PosEKE-GPT2, an improved GPT2-based model that reformulates event extraction as a text generation task. The model jointly identifies event types, triggers, and arguments using structured canonical text and a sub-task extraction strategy to reduce error propagation. An expanded positional encoding mechanism enhances event representation in long texts. Furthermore, we introduce a knowledge augmentation module that dynamically selects and integrates external knowledge via prompt mechanisms and attention-based embedding optimization. Experiments on the DuEE-Fin dataset show that PosEKE-GPT2 achieves an average F1-score of 90.61, while on the FewFC dataset it reaches an average F1-score of 88.85, both outperforming baseline models. Ablation studies verify the effectiveness of the positional encoding and knowledge augmentation modules, demonstrating the model's robustness and suitability for financial event extraction across different datasets.

Indexed as

Event extractionJoint extractionKnowledge augmentationPosition encoding expansion

Identifiers

PMID41219343
PMCPMC12606302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.