Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41219342›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Accuracy and safety of in-office transperineal freehand cognitive fusion prostate biopsy under local anaesthesia without antibiotic prophylaxis.

Sebastian Lenart, Osama Shahin, Malavika Krishnakumar, Jefim Stepanow, Andreas Banner, Anton Ponholzer, Clemens Mikulits, Lukas Oberhammer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sebastian LenartDepartment of Urology and Andrology, St. John of God Hospital Vienna, Johannes-von-Gott Platz 1, 1020, Vienna, Austria. sebastian.lenart@gmx.at.
Osama ShahinUromerian.ch, Basel, Switzerland.
Malavika KrishnakumarDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Amrita Institute of Medical Science and Research Centre, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Jefim StepanowDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Clinic Favoriten, Vienna, Austria.
Andreas BannerDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Clinic Favoriten, Vienna, Austria.
Anton PonholzerDepartment of Urology and Andrology, St. John of God Hospital Vienna, Johannes-von-Gott Platz 1, 1020, Vienna, Austria.
Clemens MikulitsDepartment of Urology and Andrology, St. John of God Hospital Vienna, Johannes-von-Gott Platz 1, 1020, Vienna, Austria.
Lukas OberhammerDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the cancer detection rate (CDR), tolerability, and safety of transperineal prostate biopsy (TPPB) performed under local anesthesia (LA) without antibiotic prophylaxis in an outpatient setting via a freehand technique. Between January 2015 and April 2024, 763 consecutive patients underwent TPPB at a single center. Of these, 538 patients received no antibiotics. Biopsies were performed via a freehand MRI/ultrasound fusion technique under LA. Patient discomfort was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS), and complications were recorded using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Statistical analysis was conducted using non-parametric methods (α = 0.05). Among the 538 patients without antibiotic prophylaxis, the overall CDR was 61.7%, with clinically significant prostate cancer (ISUP ≥ 2) detected in 47.4% of the patients. No infectious complications occurred. The level of pain was generally low (mean VAS 2.7), and 91.6% of patients reported no or only mild pain. Complications were rare (1.1%), with urinary retention being the most common (0.9%), associated with larger prostate volume (> 50 mL). Combining systematic and targeted biopsy yielded the highest diagnostic accuracy (CDR 65.9%, p = 0.023). TPPB using a freehand technique under LA, without antibiotic prophylaxis, is a safe, effective, and well-tolerated in-office procedure. It achieves high diagnostic yield without infectious complications, offering a viable, cost-efficient alternative to traditional transrectal approaches-especially relevant amid increasing antibiotic resistance.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, LocalImage-Guided BiopsyProstateProstatic NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overAntibiotic ProphylaxisHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPerineumFusion biopsyProstate cancerTransperineal prostate biopsy

Identifiers

PMID41219342
PMCPMC12606294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.