ArticleScientific reports2025
Multi-layer encrypted learning for distributed healthcare analytics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) enables continuous collection and transmission of healthcare data through interconnected networks of patient wearables and other devices. This capability transforms traditional healthcare systems into data-rich environments. However, this also brings privacy concerns because of the widespread distribution of health data across multiple healthcare systems. Such concerns, including data breaches and privacy violations, become paramount when aggregating data into a centralized location for analytical purposes. Therefore, this paper proposes a novel privacy-preserving framework designed with a three-layer protection mechanism for distributed healthcare analytics on encrypted data. This framework mitigates the risk of data breaches while balancing data privacy with model accuracy tradeoffs. First, fully homomorphic encryption (FHE) is introduced to encrypt healthcare data. This mechanism enables analytical computations while mitigating the risk of data breaches. Building on this, we develop a distributed FHE framework that eliminates the need for centralized data storage and supports iterative learning through continuous model updates as new data become available. Furthermore, we propose a distributed ensemble learning architecture that leverages parallel processing to accelerate the generation of consensus models for healthcare analytics. Experimental results from real-world intensive care unit (ICU) case studies show that the proposed framework effectively protects data privacy while maintaining the performance of analytical models. Moreover, compared with individual departmental models, the proposed privacy-preserving framework achieves the highest accuracy of 84.6%. These findings highlight the potential of a federated privacy-preserving framework to avoid centralized data storage and support collaborative analytics in data-rich healthcare environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.