ArticleScientific reports2025
An experience sampling study exploring associations between contextual factors and prolonged grief reactions in daily life.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The association between one's social life and symptoms of prolonged grief following a traumatic loss: an ecological momentary assessment study.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2025Article
- A FAIR intensive longitudinal data archive on prolonged grief in daily life.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2025Article
- Exploring reactivity effects of self-monitoring prolonged grief reactions in daily life: A randomized waitlist-controlled trial using experience sampling methodology.Internet interventions · 2025Article
- Daily life after the death of a loved one: A systematic review of daily diary and ecological momentary assessment studies.International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHPArticle
- Feasibility and acceptability of using experience sampling method to assess daily grief reactions in Viet Nam.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Theoretical and anecdotal work suggests that Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD) reactions go up and down during the day. However, empirical evidence supporting this claim is lacking. It is also unknown in which context PGD reactions go up and down. Using Experience Sampling Methodology (ESM), we examined whether PGD reactions (ESM-PGD) relate to contextual factors in daily life. For 14 days, five times per day, bereaved adults (N = 53; 74% women) rated the intensity of 11 ESM-PGD reactions representing DSM-5-TR PGD symptoms. Using mixed-effect regression analyses, we examined whether contextual factors (i.e., physical and social environments, and time of day) were associated with each ESM-PGD reaction separately. Being away from home compared to being at home was associated with more avoidance. Being alone compared to being in a pleasant social contact was associated with more preoccupation with the loss, intensified feelings that part of oneself died, and increased perception of the loss as unreal. Lastly, a later time of day was related to stronger feelings of loneliness and difficulties moving on. Our findings suggest that ESM-PGD reactions may be context-dependent. This calls for a context-sensitive treatment approach, such as ecological momentary interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.