Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41219315›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Evaluation of an artificial intelligence model for opportunistic Agatston scoring on non-gated chest computed tomography.

Suzannah E McKinney, Sarah F Mercaldo, John K Chin, Ankita Ghatak, Madeleine A Halle, Sandeep S Hedgire, Nandini M Meyersohn, Brian Ghoshhajra, Keith J Dreyer, Mannudeep Kalra and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Suzannah E McKinneyMass General Brigham AI, 399 Revolution Dr, Boston, MA, 02145, USA. semckinney@mgh.harvard.edu.
Sarah F MercaldoMass General Brigham AI, 399 Revolution Dr, Boston, MA, 02145, USA.
John K ChinMass General Brigham AI, 399 Revolution Dr, Boston, MA, 02145, USA.
Ankita GhatakMass General Brigham AI, 399 Revolution Dr, Boston, MA, 02145, USA.
Madeleine A HalleMass General Brigham AI, 399 Revolution Dr, Boston, MA, 02145, USA.
Sandeep S HedgireDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Nandini M MeyersohnDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Brian GhoshhajraDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Keith J DreyerMass General Brigham AI, 399 Revolution Dr, Boston, MA, 02145, USA.
Mannudeep KalraDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Bernardo C BizzoMass General Brigham AI, 399 Revolution Dr, Boston, MA, 02145, USA.
James M HillisMass General Brigham AI, 399 Revolution Dr, Boston, MA, 02145, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Agatston score is a measure of cardiovascular disease traditionally calculated on cardiac gated computed tomography (CT) of the chest. Cardiac gated CT is resource-intensive, can be hard to access, and involves extra radiation exposure. Artificial intelligence (AI) can be used to opportunistically calculate Agatston scores on non-gated CTs performed for other indications. This retrospective standalone performance assessment compared the accuracy of an AI model (Riverain Technologies ClearRead CT CAC) at calculating Agatston scores on non-gated CTs to both consensus radiologist interpretations on the same CTs and Agatston scores from the original radiology reports of paired cardiac gated CTs. It involved 491 non-contrast CT chest cases acquired at five hospitals in the United States between January 2022 and December 2023; approximately two-thirds had a paired cardiac gated CT. It compared the agreement of Agatston categories (0, 1-99, 100-399 and ≥ 400) using the quadratic weighted Kappa coefficient and the correlation of Agatston scores using the Spearman coefficient. The agreement of Agatston categories between the AI model and ground truth radiologists was 0.959 (95% CI: 0.943 to 0.975); this result was broadly consistent across sex, age group, race, ethnicity and CT scanner manufacturer subgroups. The agreement between the AI model and paired cardiac gated CT was 0.906 (95% CI: 0.882 to 0.927). The correlations of Agatston scores for these two comparisons were 0.975 (95% CI: 0.962 to 0.987) and 0.942 (95% CI: 0.920 to 0.957) respectively. The assessed AI model accurately calculated Agatston scores on non-gated CTs and produced similar scores to paired cardiac gated CTs. Its use could broaden screening for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, enabling opportunistic screening on CTs captured for other indications.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCardiovascular DiseasesRadiography, ThoracicTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID41219315
PMCPMC12606249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.