ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative socioeconomic, environmental and technical analysis of conventional versus smart sustainable integrated multi-trophic aquaponics systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Improving Essential Oil, Pigments, and Mineral Accumulation in Basil Through Integrated Silicon and Nano-Fertilizer Treatments in Aquaponics.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aquaponics the integration of aquatic animals and horticultural is a sustainable solution for optimizing nutrient and water reuse in food systems. This study evaluates the economic feasibility of a small-scale, solar-powered Integrated Multi-Trophic Aquaculture (IMTA)-aquaponic system by comparing biomass yields of aquatic species and various vegetables crops between smart hydroponic, traditional hydroponic, and soil-based systems. Installation, operational costs, and financial metrics (net income, return on equity, operating ratio) were analyzed, with AI-enhanced IMTA-aquaponics evaluated against conventional methods, including solar and smart monitoring expenses. A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) further examined environmental and social impacts in the Egyptian context. The findings highlight that IMTA-aquaponics presents a sustainable solution to global challenges like population growth, water scarcity, and climate change, offering youth in developing nations entrepreneurial opportunities. Despite variables such as planting density and material costs affecting outcomes, the system proves highly profitable. However, climate-dependent productivity and price fluctuations necessitate strategic production planning. Aligning crop cycles with high-demand, low-supply periods maximizes profitability. Ultimately, smart IMTA-aquaponics demonstrates economic viability in Egypt, achieving faster break-even points and greater market shock resilience than conventional farming, reinforcing its potential as a scalable, sustainable agricultural model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.