ArticleScientific reports2025
A hybrid evolutionary algorithm for influence maximization in complex networks using invasive weed optimization and gravitational search.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ocial networks are critical platforms for information dissemination, yet optimizing over their large, rugged search spaces remains challenging. We propose a Hybrid Weed-Gravitational Evolutionary Algorithm (HWGEA) that unifies adaptive seed dispersal from Invasive Weed Optimization with attraction dynamics from Gravitational Search in a single reproduction step, complemented by an adaptive mutation that preserves diversity. We further develop a discrete variant, DHWGEA, tailored to influence maximization on graphs via topology-aware initialization, a dynamic neighborhood local search, and an Expected Influence Score surrogate that reduces simulation cost. Across 23 continuous benchmarks, HWGEA attains the best Friedman mean rank (2.41) and shows statistical parity with LSHADE-SPACMA and SHADE, while significantly outperforming GBO, GOA, RSA, PDO, GSA, and GA (Holm-adjusted Wilcoxon tests). On real engineering designs, HWGEA delivers competitive or improved optima with stable convergence. For influence maximization, DHWGEA achieves spreads within 2-5% of CELF at roughly 3-4 × lower runtime and clearly exceeds PageRank's spread at moderate cost, offering a practical accuracy-efficiency trade-off for medium-to-large networks. Sensitivity studies identify stable parameter ranges and show that adaptive components reduce dependence on manual tuning. Experiments are averaged over 30 runs with independent seeds to ensure reproducibility. Overall, HWGEA/DHWGEA provide a cohesive, scalable framework for continuous and discrete optimization, balancing exploration and exploitation while maintaining robustness across tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.