ArticleScientific reports2025
An explainable deep learning framework for trustworthy arrhythmia detection from ECG signals.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Chaos to Care: Personalized AI for Early Cardiac Arrhythmia Warning.Machine learning with applications · 2026Article
- ScaHybNet: a scalogram-based hybrid ensemble network for ECG arrhythmia classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Early detection of chronic kidney disease based on a SURD-enhanced machine learning model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) constitute a foremost global health challenge, with cardiac arrhythmias significantly increasing both mortality and morbidity. Early and precise detection of these arrhythmias from Electrocardiogram (ECG) signals is paramount but inherently complex due to the vast volume, diverse characteristics and variability of ECG data. While Deep Learning (DL) models offer transformative potential for automated ECG analysis, their widespread clinical adoption is hindered by issues such as susceptibility to overfitting, high computational demands and a notable lack of interpretability, resulting in black-box systems. This paper presents an explainable DL framework for accurate and reliable arrhythmia detection. Our innovative approach integrates advanced DL architectures, specifically Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Dense Neural Network (DNN), within a sophisticated multi-stage pipeline. This pipeline encompasses meticulous data preparation, state-of-the-art signal preprocessing and robust multi-strategy data balancing techniques, including ADASYN, SMOTE, SMOTETomek and Random Over-Sampling (ROS), to maximize model performance and generalization. Crucially, the framework incorporates Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methodologies-namely SHAP, LIME and Feature Importance Analysis (FIA) to provide transparent insights into the model's decision-making process. Rigorous evaluation on benchmark ECG datasets such as MITDB, PTBDB and NSTDB, demonstrates superior classification accuracy, with our ROS+CNN model achieving 99.74%, 99.43% and 99.98%, respectively. The embedded XAI components offer actionable interpretability, fostering clinical trust and paving the way for more reliable and impactful AI-driven cardiovascular diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.