ArticleScientific reports2025
Context-based sentiment analysis using a BiGRU DistilBERT fusion model for COVID-19 tweets.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic triggered an unprecedented surge in Twitter activity, providing a rich source of public opinions and emotions. This study proposes a fusion model combining a bidirectional GRU (BiGRU) and a DistilBERT transformer, with their learned features concatenated and fed into an XGBoost meta-classifier for final sentiment prediction. We evaluate our approach on over one million COVID-19-related English-language tweets collected from eight countries between January and April 2020. The fusion model (BiGRU + DistilBERT + XGBoost) achieves a classification accuracy of ~ 85.8%, outperforming individual models (for example, DistilBERT alone at 85.5% accuracy) in sentiment detection. Key results indicate that public sentiment evolved with pandemic phases: negative sentiments peaked during surges in cases and deaths, while positive sentiments rose during recovery periods. We also observe notable regional differences - for instance, sentiment trends vary across countries and between English- vs. non-English-speaking regions. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of our context-infused approach, offering valuable insights for policymakers on social media sentiment during health crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.