Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41219278›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Context-based sentiment analysis using a BiGRU DistilBERT fusion model for COVID-19 tweets.

Utkarsh Sharma, Prateek Pandey, Shishir Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Utkarsh SharmaDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Jaypee University of Engineering and Technology, Guna, India. utkarsh_shar@yahoo.co.in.
Prateek PandeyDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, Jaypee University of Engineering and Technology, Guna, India.
Shishir KumarDepartment of Computer Science, Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic triggered an unprecedented surge in Twitter activity, providing a rich source of public opinions and emotions. This study proposes a fusion model combining a bidirectional GRU (BiGRU) and a DistilBERT transformer, with their learned features concatenated and fed into an XGBoost meta-classifier for final sentiment prediction. We evaluate our approach on over one million COVID-19-related English-language tweets collected from eight countries between January and April 2020. The fusion model (BiGRU + DistilBERT + XGBoost) achieves a classification accuracy of ~ 85.8%, outperforming individual models (for example, DistilBERT alone at 85.5% accuracy) in sentiment detection. Key results indicate that public sentiment evolved with pandemic phases: negative sentiments peaked during surges in cases and deaths, while positive sentiments rose during recovery periods. We also observe notable regional differences - for instance, sentiment trends vary across countries and between English- vs. non-English-speaking regions. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of our context-infused approach, offering valuable insights for policymakers on social media sentiment during health crises.

Indexed as

COVID-19Public OpinionSocial MediaEmotionsHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Contextual NLPCOVID-19Sentiment analysisSocial media analyticsTwitter data

Identifiers

PMID41219278
PMCPMC12606215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.